Applying gain scheduling

Exploring a process scenario that may be a good place to apply a gain scheduling strategy.


Dear Control Engineering: I enjoyed your article about gain scheduling. I’m curious as to your thoughts about another variable gain scenario. Suppose a PID loop heats a measured but unregulated flowing stream. The changing flow rate would seem to change the response dynamics of the heating loop, requiring different tuning parameters. Is this a suitable case for implementing a gain schedule based on flowrate similar to your tank level application?

Thanks, Dale Cresap.

Vance VanDoren’s Back to Basics article drew a number of comments including this one. Here is Vance’s response:

Yes, I think it is. The time constant of your heating process probably lengthens as the flowrate goes up since a larger portion of the heat added by your PID loop is carried downstream, thereby increasing the time required to reach the setpoint. And since more heat is required to achieve the same temperature change, your process gain probably drops as the flowrate goes up. A gain schedule in your controller should help you combat those effects by forcing the controller to be more aggressive at higher flowrates.

I talked to Vance about his suggestion to clarify a couple points. First, we’re assuming that the temperature sensor feeds its signal to the PID controller, which modulates the heater. Vance thinks that setting the gain schedule based on flow can probably be done more easily from empirical data based on observation rather than a formula, although either could be possible.

I would add another thought, and ask which measuring device should be operative sensor. If the temperature is the wider variable and flow is less subject to change, then the discussion above is probably the way to go. On the other hand, if temperature is relatively stable and the flow can change more drastically, maybe it should be flowmeter? Of course that suggest a completely different control strategy, which we’ll leave for another time.

Peter Welander,

No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
Salary survey: How much are you worth?; Dedicated outdoor air systems; Energy models and lighting
Fire, life safety in schools; Fire protection codes; Detection, suppression, and notification; 2015 Commissioning Giants; Emergency and standby power in hospitals
HVAC and building envelope: Efficient, effective systems; Designing fire sprinkler systems; Wireless controls in buildings; 2015 Product of the Year winners
Designing positive-energy buildings; Ensuring power quality; Complying with NFPA 110; Minimizing arc flash hazards
Implementing microgrids: Controlling campus power generation; Understanding cogeneration systems; Evaluating UPS system efficiency; Driving data center PUE, efficiency
Optimizing genset sizing; How the Internet of Things affects the data center; Increasing transformer efficiency; Standby vs. emergency power in mission critical facilities
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.