Advertisement
FREE subscription
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Data Center's Redesign Saves Money, Time

Staff -- Consulting-Specifying Engineer, 3/1/2002

At its 20,000-sq.-ft. data center in Dallas, J.P. Morgan Chase handles an array of global financial services—with mission-critical requirements.

Four 1,500-kW diesel generators operate in parallel on a common bus at the center. Two UPS systems, each consisting of two 375-kVA modules—with the ability to expand to four each—also operate in parallel on a common bus. Each UPS system feeds nine redundant 125-kVA static-switch power distribution units (PDUs).

A switchgear parallels the four diesel gensets, which are for standby power. A key software component allows facility operators to remotely monitor, control and even troubleshoot the gensets.

Lead times for orders of wet-cell battery strings were running at 28 weeks. Creative project scheduling led to immediate delivery of four strings of wet-cell batteries for the data center, but this meant keeping the batteries at a storage facility with the proper environment until needed.

Additionally, all switchgear requirements were bundled under one manufacturer. This required a new relationship to be forged between the switchgear and UPS makers.

Initial system requirements for the paralleling switchgear came up with a short-circuit rating of greater than 100 kiloamps interrupted current (kAIC)—not a "standard" rating—meaning longer lead times. The problem was solved by engineers who redesigned the switchgear to a lower kAIC rating that would still meet the data center's needs.

Reactors were installed in the neutrals of the diesel generators to limit their fault-carrying ability. A bus tie-circuit breaker was designed into the diesel paralleling gear. By controlling this breaker during any overlap transfer, the fault-carrying ability was limited. What's more, achieving a lower kAIC rating lowered the system's overall purchase price.

New generators had lead times of up to 20 weeks. Initially, the generator package included two refurbished generators and a new one—all three gensets sized at 1,750 kW, with the customer option to add a fourth. With Texas on the verge of utility deregulation, the firm was encouraged to look at the feasibility of exporting power back to the utility grid and set up its system to allow for that option.

As a result, the system design was switched to include the four 1,500-kW engine generators—with the supplier guaranteeing delivery dates. And the use of 1,500-kW, instead of 1,750-kW, units was another cost savings.

For more information on the project engineering capabilities of Encorp, circle number 451 on the Reader Service Card.

From Pure Power, Spring 2002.

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author



SPONSORED LINKS

 
Advertisement
Sponsored Links

More Content

  • Blogs

Blogs


Sorry, no blogs are active for this topic.

» VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Advertisements





NEWSLETTERS
Plug in and get the latest CSE news, trends and industry updates delivered directly to your inbox!

Green Scene
CSE Codes & Standards
CSE NewsWatch
CSE Fire and Life Safety Solutions
CSE Business of Engineering Management Report
CSE Electrical Solutions
CSE HVAC Solutions
Pure Power
CSE Product Showcase
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites