High-tech manufacturing moving from U.S. to Asia

The U.S. lost 28% of its high-technology manufacturing jobs over the last decade, as the nation’s rapidly shrinking lead in science and technology in the global marketplace was accompanied by a toll on U.S. high-tech jobs.

03/14/2012


The U.S. lost 28% of its high-technology manufacturing jobs over the last decade, as the nation’s rapidly shrinking lead in science and technology in the global marketplace was accompanied by a toll on U.S. high-tech jobs, according to a new study from the National Science Board, the policy making body for the National Science Foundation.

One of the most dramatic signs of this trend was the loss of 687,000 high-technology manufacturing jobs since 2000. U.S. multinational corporations also created research and development jobs overseas at an unprecedented rate. Meanwhile, China became the world leader in high-technology trade and, for the first time, Asia matched the U.S. in R+D investments.

Those were among the key findings released by the NSB, as it unveiled the most comprehensive and up-to-date information and analysis on the nation’s position in science and technology. The biennial report, Science and Engineering Indicators (SEI), highlights trends and factors that have an impact on the nation’s economy, competitiveness and innovation capacity.

U.S. employment in high-technology manufacturing reached a peak in 2000, with 2.5 million jobs. The recession of 2001 provided the first big hit causing “substantial and permanent” job losses, the report said. By the end of the decade, more than a quarter of the jobs were gone.

“The latest data clearly show the economic consequences of the eroding competitive advantage the U.S. has historically enjoyed in science and technology,” said Dr. José-Marie Griffiths, chairman of the NSB committee that oversees production of the report. “Other nations clearly recognize the economic and social benefits of investing in R+D and education, and they are challenging the U.S. leadership position. We’re seeing the result in the very real, and substantial, loss of good jobs.”

“The volume gives a clear picture of the U.S. position in globalization,” Griffiths said. “Over the last decade, the world has changed dramatically. It’s now a world with very different actors who have made advancement in science and technology a top priority. And many of the troubling trends we’re seeing are now very well established.”

U.S. firms create more R+D jobs abroad

On top of the lost manufacturing employment, U.S. multinational corporations are rapidly expanding their R+D jobs overseas. From 1994–2004, U.S. firms established R+D jobs abroad at a relatively slow annual rate of 3%, increasing the share of their R+D employment overseas from 14% to 16%.

But according to preliminary figures, in the five years after that (2004–2009), the number of new R+D jobs overseas took off, growing to 27% of all R+D jobs at these U.S. firms. Since 2004, about 85% of R+D employment growth in U.S. multinational corporations has been abroad.

That rapid increase in employment by U.S. firms abroad contrasts with very modest growth in R+D employment in the U.S. by foreign companies.

“This apparent acceleration of U.S. R+D jobs overseas, along with other indicators, suggests that the capabilities of Asian countries are strong enough to accommodate such a rapid shift,” said Rolf Lehing, NSF’s program director for the report. “The policies of Asian governments appear to be paying off for them, and U.S. companies seem to be confident in the quality of R+D work done abroad.”

The relative shift of R+D to Asia also can be seen in overall expenditures. The U.S. still does more R+D than any other single country, spending $400 billion in 2009. But, for the first time, the Asian region has nearly matched the U.S., with R+D expenditures of $399 billion.

Other key findings in the report include:

  • Three countries—the U.S., China and Japan—were responsible for more than half of the world’s $1.28 trillion in R+D spending in 2009. (China overtook Japan during the last decade to become the second-largest R+D-performing nation.)

  • Between 1999 and 2009, the U.S. share of R+D dropped from 38% to 31%; the EU’s share declined from 27% to 23%; and the Asian region grew from 24% to 32%.

  • Many Asian countries have increased their investment in R+D relative to their GDP, with China almost tripling its R+D/GDP ratio since 1996. The U.S. R+D/GDP ratio recently has edged upward, while that of the EU has remained steady.

  • The developed world’s lead in higher education has declined dramatically. In 2008, only 4% of the world’s engineering degrees were earned in the U.S., while 56% were awarded in Asia, including one-third in China.

  • The number of natural sciences and engineering doctorates awarded by Chinese universities has more than tripled since 2000. At 26,000 awarded in 2008, the number of these Chinese doctorates now exceeds the number earned in the U.S.. And, unlike in China, a large share of these U.S. doctoral degrees are awarded to foreign students. In 2009, 44% of the 24,700 U.S. natural sciences and engineering doctorates were awarded to temporary visa holders. Some 57% of engineering doctorates were awarded to foreign students.

  • American industry, which historically has supported about 60% of U.S. R+D, reduced R+D funding by nearly 4% in 2009. (A rise in U.S. government R+D funding under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act partially offset the private-sector reduction.)

  • Job losses from the 2007–2009 recession were less severe for science and engineering workers than for the U.S. workforce as a whole. In 2010, the median income for workers in science and engineering jobs ($73,290) was more than double the median income of all U.S. workers ($33,840).


No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
integrated building networks, NFPA 99, recover waste heat, chilled water systems, Internet of Things, BAS controls
40 Under 40; Performance-based design; Clean agent fire suppression; NFPA 92; Future of commissioning; Successful project management principles
BIM coordination; MEP projects; NFPA 13; Data center Q&A; Networked lighting controls; 2017 Product of the Year finalists
Transformers; Electrical system design; Selecting and sizing transformers; Grounded and ungrounded system design, Paralleling generator systems
Commissioning electrical systems; Designing emergency and standby generator systems; VFDs in high-performance buildings
Tying a microgrid to the smart grid; Paralleling generator systems; Previewing NEC 2017 changes
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.
Automation Engineer; Wood Group
System Integrator; Cross Integrated Systems Group
Fire & Life Safety Engineer; Technip USA Inc.
This course focuses on climate analysis, appropriateness of cooling system selection, and combining cooling systems.
This course will help identify and reveal electrical hazards and identify the solutions to implementing and maintaining a safe work environment.
This course explains how maintaining power and communication systems through emergency power-generation systems is critical.
click me