Evaluating the nuances of outpatient facilities

Whether a stand-alone facility or attached to a hospital, business-based healthcare can be a challenge to navigate from the construction and design perspective, a difficult prospect to manage from the facility engineer’s perspective,

By Alex Harwell November 12, 2020

Business healthcare: the ubiquitous medical office building in its many forms as imaging center, specialty care facility, and so many others.  Whether a stand-alone facility or attached to a hospital, business-based healthcare can be a challenge to navigate from the construction and design perspective, a difficult prospect to manage from the facility engineer’s perspective, and a very popular platform for leadership and patients. There are several reasons as to why business-based care is so important as well as the types of classifications and their application, and the relationships between clinical and financial aspects to the buildings themselves (Click here to listen to an audio interview for more information).

What is business healthcare?

From a patient perspective, outpatient facilities often combine a trusted healthcare name with easy parking, clean and new facilities, a shorter drive, and a higher likelihood of insurance and Medicare/Medicaid acceptance.

From a hospital system leadership perspective, these facilities offer attractive reimbursement rates with competitively low construction and operational costs, faster speed to market, and more flexibility in divesting and acquisition than their hospital-based counterparts.

From a facility engineering management viewpoint, depending on the relationship of responsibility, outpatient care facilities can present a management challenge with respect to tenant relationships, data accessibility, clinical services creep, remote troubleshooting, and leased equipment and structures.

Finally, from the designer’s and regulator’s perspectives, the facilities can be difficult to right-design, correctly matching up clinical, reimbursement, and operational catalysts with the appropriate systems designs and compliance structures. Unlike hospital design where the regulatory requirements and appropriate design levels for services are relatively straightforward, well documented, and well enforced, in the outpatient setting, the application of these same standards can be murky and ambiguous.

Capital and operational savings

Of course a major factor to any facility owner is cost. With outpatient facilities, the operational savings have the potential to be quite high. Based on data we’ve collected from our own projects, CostWorks, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) historical data, and local hospital publicized provider data, outpatient facility owners may see a 30% capital outlay savings and 50% operational budget savings compared to equivalent services based within a hospital setting. These savings come largely from the lower overall cost of construction and materials in simpler structures. Additionally, under the current reimbursement systems through private insurers, CMS outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS), and licensed Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC) payment programs, the same services administered in a hospital-provider-based outpatient setting may net just 10% less than if it were in a hospital setting.

Classification catalysts and codes/standards

Walking the line between protecting the relative cost savings of outpatient care, and providing sufficient and compliant facilities, the designer is tasked with determining the correct application of outpatient care codes, standards, and guidelines. As mentioned previously, this is not always a clear and straightforward process. Determining which codes and standards are applicable in each design requires a solid understanding of the care environment beyond the occupancy classification alone. These may include system and equipment failure risks to occupants, patient admission status and classification, reimbursement status and source, self-preservation capabilities, floors and building size, anesthesia and sedation, special procedures, and hours of operation. Various codes and standards could include International Building Code (IBC) Business Occupancy Classifications; IBC 422, Ambulatory Care Classification; National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 101, Ambulatory Health Care; NFPA 99, Health Care Facilities Code; NFPA 70, National Electrical Code Article 517; Facility Guidelines Institute (FGI) Outpatient Guidelines; as well as CMS accreditation organizations.

The outpatient environment does present a tangible risk as patient care continues to expand into business occupancies not necessarily equipped to mitigate hazards. However, diligence in understanding the patient care environment and applying appropriate categorizations and their associated features will help better prepare facility operators and owners to safely serve communities for decades to come.

This article originally appeared on Dewberry’s websiteDewberry is a CFE Media content partner. 

Original content can be found at www.dewberry.com.

Author Bio: Alex Harwell, associate, Dewberry