Implementing 2019 NFPA 110
The 2019 edition of NFPA 110: Standard for Emergency and Standby Power Systems includes a variety of revisions and updates that clarify design
- Understand the changes to the 2019 edition of NFPA 110: Standard for Emergency and Standby Power Systems.
- Learn the definitions of EPS and EPSS.
- Consider classifications of type, class and level.
The 2019 edition of NFPA 110: Standard for Emergency and Standby Power Systems includes a variety of revisions and updates that clarify the intent of the technical committee with a few added requirements. Code references in this article are to the 2019 edition, unless stated otherwise. One of the changes is a revision to the description of the primary source, renamed to “normal” to align with other sections and NFPA 70: National Electrical Code. NEC does not define when a standby power system is needed, but explains how to implement, test and maintain the functionality of these systems.
NFPA 110 has two primary equipment and system definitions that will be referenced throughout this article: emergency power supply and emergency power supply system. The EPS is the source of energy that provides an alternate source when the primary or normal, source fails and includes any common bussing or overcurrent protection devices associated with the alternate source. The EPSS is the equipment that distributes the electrical energy generated by the EPS.
The scope of EPSS equipment includes every distribution component from the output of the EPS to the transfer switch(es). See Figure 1 for a delineation of EPS and EPSS scope.
Before the specific requirements of NFPA 110 can be applied, there are three parameters defined in Chapter 4 that need to be determined: type, class and level. The type refers to the amount of time, in seconds, that is allowed to occur between the loss of the primary or normal, source and the acceptance of the alternate or standby, source. Options for power restoration time are 10 seconds, 60 seconds, 120 seconds, manual and uninterruptible. Uninterruptible is a classification used for uninterruptable power supply systems and is not applied to standby generator systems.
The “class” refers to the amount of runtime, in hours, that is required before the alternate or standby, source requires refueling or recharging. Options for run time include five minutes, 15 minutes, two hours, six hours, 48 hours and class X. Class X is a timeframe that is required by other sections of NFPA 110, other codes or the authority having jurisdiction.
Level classification relates to the type of loads served and is specified by other codes. A level 1 system has more stringent requirements than a level 2 system. Systems can be classified as level 1 or level 2 with the difference being the risk to loss of human life given the failure of the system. If building occupants are at risk of serious injury or death due to a failure of the system to function, then the system must be classified as level 1, as noted in NFPA 110 4.4.1.
Examples of this include, but are not limited to, health care as required by NFPA 99: Health Care Facilities Code and high-rise occupancy types as required by the International Building Code. Level 2 systems are specified when loss of life is not a possibility, given a failure of the EPS or EPSS.
One example of a level 2 load could be air handling unit or building conditioning equipment. Unless expressly required in other building codes, a risk analysis should be performed to determine which level is applicable to the system.
Designers familiar with NFPA 99 may notice that the level classification for an EPS and EPSS is similar, but different, from the category classification of patient care spaces in NFPA 99 Chapter 4. For example, 2018 NFPA 99 identifies a type 1 essential electrical system and a type 2 EES; those definitions correlate to a level 1 EPSS or a level 2 EPSS, respectively. Engineers should pay careful attention to how terminology is used in each code section referenced.
NFPA 110 does not define which of these three classifications are applicable to which types of systems, rather those are defined in other building or NFPA codes. Examples of other code sections that reference NFPA 110 and identify the classifications are:
- The 2018 edition of NFPA 101 18.104.22.168 requires a type 60, class 2, level 2 EPSS for pressurization systems serving building egress enclosures.
- The 2018 edition of NFPA 99 22.214.171.124.4.1 requires type 10, class X, level 1 generator sets and references NFPA 110 for health care occupancies.
- The 2018 edition of NFPA 101 126.96.36.199.1 requires a type 60, class 1, level 1 standby power system be provided for high-rise structures.
Section A.4.2 of the annex in NFPA 110 identifies that class X usually consists of 48- or 96-hour run times and correlates a 96-hour run time with level 1 systems in category C or higher seismic design categories. The idea behind fuel storage that lasts several days is due to the proclivity of natural disasters that could prevent fuel delivery to facilities with a level 1 classification. While the annex lists requirements for high seismic areas, the same risk analysis could be applied to areas subject to flooding or hurricanes to ensure that critical facilities are able to operate when fuel delivery is hindered. Further, the designer or facility should ensure that the EPS, EPSS and fuel refilling locations are accessible and above flood plains.
The 2019 edition of NFPA 110 has several revisions that are related to the assigned level. Section 188.8.131.52 (6) has a new requirement for level 1 EPS battery chargers to have temperature compensation. Battery charger requirements are explained in more detail in table 184.108.40.206 with differences in level 1 and level 2 systems explained.
Another revision includes section 7.9.13, which was first added in the 2016 edition. This addition to the code prohibited the use of automatically actuated valves, i.e., solenoid valves, in fuel oil supply or return lines. In 2019, a statement was added to this section that clarifies that this applies to level 1 EPS, which can be interpreted to mean that a level 2 EPS may have actuated valves in the supply or return piping.
The installation of automatically actuated valves may be due to the physical arrangement of the fuel oil system components in existing systems where overhead piping presents an overflow condition. It is common for fuel oil systems to be shared between standby diesel generators and boilers that use fuel oil as a secondary source. Because boilers and EPS components are not co-located, the physical arrangement of fuel oil piping is crucial to allow for gravity draining back to the main tanks, as required by section 220.127.116.11.
Code updates and revisions
NFPA 110 explains several aspects of the starting, stopping and emergency stop controls with revisions for the 2019 edition. Section 18.104.22.168 (2)(c) is simplified for 2019 and eliminates the specific requirement in previous editions for how local contacts shall behave. In the 2016 edition, starting was to be accomplished by closing a set of contacts. Stopping was to occur when those contacts were opened. For 2019 this wording is simplified to state that contacts can both start and stop the prime mover. This provides flexibility for the manufacturer for contact behavior and configuration.
Section 22.214.171.124 explains the acceptable methods for initiating the cranking cycle of a prime mover. Section 126.96.36.199 (2) has a similar revision where the requirements for contact behavior are simplified. Part 188.8.131.52 (5) was added in 2019 to clarify prime mover starting methods when an automatic transfer switch is not present.
In addition to the typical starting and stopping scenarios, an emergency stop is required by section 184.108.40.206. This section was revised for clarity of intent and allows for the emergency stop to be located on an exterior enclosure. This revision also added a new section 220.127.116.11.2 with a stand-alone requirement to limit the access to the emergency stop as opposed to the previously stated requirement to “prevent inadvertent operation.”
Section 18.104.22.168.3 is new for 2019 and requires labeling to identifying the purpose of the emergency stop, requiring that the prime mover be identified. These new sections are important for both single generator installations and multiple generator installations and designers will need to carefully coordinate with the facility to ensure that emergency stop switch locations are coordinated.
Section 6.3 is reworded to clarify paralleled generator set load shed/add requirements and now must include logic to maintain power quality through load management strategies. One of the main ways that connected loads can be managed to protect the EPSS is through load step programming, which is a process by which the generator paralleling logic assigns inhibit signals to ATSs to control when they transfer.
During design and installation, each ATS is assigned a priority. The highest priority loads are transferred first, as determined by the type classification discussed previously. Typically, for systems using multiple generators, the standby generators are sized such that all of the highest priority loads are within the capacity of one generator set. This allows for the restoration time, as defined by the specific type rating, to be met without waiting for all of the generators to sync together. As stated in 6.3.1 (2), as additional generators are added, additional loads can be added, in order of their priority.
Optional or equipment branches, whose loads do not pose a threat to loss of life, can be removed from the EPSS when connected loads are in excess of the EPS capacity. This is usually determined by monitoring the output frequency of the EPS. When a frequency dip occurs, the logic monitors the severity and duration and programming determines the point at which ATS loads are removed. The previously assigned priorities determine the order the loads are removed, as stated in section 6.3.1 (3).
Another method of load management may be accomplished by the paralleling logic providing the available generator capacity to a mechanical control system to vary the mechanical system load. One example of this approach is for electric centrifugal chiller systems where the chiller load and pumping load can be actively controlled.
NFPA 110 Chapter 7 covers the environmental conditions and the installation requirements for the EPS and EPSS equipment. Section 7.1.5 describes the behavior of the EPS relative to the availability of the normal or utility source. This section also allows for peak shaving in coordination with the utility provider. Note that the ability to use an EPS when the normal source is available is carefully limited by the Environmental Protection Agency and the regulations of nonroad compression-ignition engines designated “heavy equipment.” When peak shaving is desired with the use of diesel generator sets, the requirements of 40 CFR Part 1039 for Tier 4 emission standards will apply.
Section 7.11 covers the protection requirements including fire suppression, fire detection, lightning protection and seismic shock protection. Other physical concerns include flooding and projectiles due to high windstorms (i.e., tornadoes or hurricanes), as noted in section 7.2.4.
Chapter 7 also includes testing requirements and the 2019 edition added a requirement for coolant temperature during two-hour full-load testing. The new wording in section 22.214.171.124 clarifies that the coolant temperature must stabilize at least 30 minutes before the end of the test. This requirement prevents the chance of overheating if the system is running for more than two hours and further clarifies that the temperature stability should be relative to the outdoor air temperature. Proper thermal management is important for any cooling system and the two primary types of generator set cooling are unit-mounted and remote-mounted radiators.
For unit-mounted radiators, the arrangement of the EPS in the room relative to the size and location of the outdoor air intake and discharge plenums is important. The air moving through the room experiences static pressure relative to the path and type of obstructions. If the obstructions result in static pressures that exceed the capacity of the unit-mounted radiator fan, the capacity of the generator system is reduced. Louvers, dampers, ducts, plenums, etc. each have an effect on the static pressure effects.
When multiple generators are in the same room, the designer should evaluate static pressure effects with all units running. This is a very important item to consider when upgrading or replacing existing installations. Newer units, whether the same size or larger, are likely to have different requirements for allowable static pressure. For remote radiator arrangements, static pressure is less likely to be a concern, however, the location of the remote radiator and fan combination is of important consideration. The location should allow for adequate airflow and reduce the chance of short-cycling the air, which occurs when the hot discharge air is drawn back into the fan and pushed through the radiator again.
Concerns with airflow are not limited to cooling — they also exist for the exhaust system. Section 7.10.4 addresses this in generic terms. The backpressure experienced by the engine due to the physical arrangement and size of the exhaust piping can affect the ability of the engine to make rated power output. A careful study is required during design to ensure backpressure is properly managed. As with airflow, exhaust sizing and routing should be evaluated for any generator set replacement or upgrade.
While Section 7.2.3 was not changed for the 2019 code cycle, it is worth discussing due to the frequent occurrence that is seen in the field. Section 7.2.3 prohibits EPS and EPSS equipment from being installed in the same room as normal service equipment that is both greater than 1,000 amperes and greater than 150 volts to ground. It is very common for older installations to have both normal service unit substations or switchgear in the same room as the generator distribution, paralleling and transfer switches (EPSS). When replacing transfer switches, the designer and facility manager should consider if the existing location falls under the prohibited environment of Section 7.2.3 and if so, a new location must be found.
Engineers should be aware of both the currently adopted codes and the latest editions of code to understand both the interpretation and the intent. As codes evolve, the intent tends to be clarified in each subsequent edition. The consistent theme of NFPA 110 is one of reliability, making a level 1 standby emergency power system as reliable and robust as possible to prevent harm or loss of life to building occupants.