Evaluating UPS system efficiency

Many modern uninterruptible power supply (UPS) systems have an energy-saving operating mode. Data show that very few data centers put it to use because of the potential risks.


This article has been peer-reviewed.Learning objectives

  • Learn about the energy-saving options of uninterruptible power supply (UPS) systems.
  • Know how to save energy by running the UPS system in eco mode.
  • Understand the impacts of operating the UPS system in eco mode.

“Eco mode” is a term used with many different pieces of equipment to define a state of operation in which less energy is consumed, which is a more economical operation. When the term is used in reference to a smartphone or car, it generally means some sort of toned-down operation where not all the functions are available and the system runs certain functions at slower speeds to consume less energy. Whether this affects the overall operation of the equipment depends on what task the equipment is performing.

The main function of an uninterruptible power supply (UPS) is to protect the critical load during an outage by supplying backup power from a stored-energy device, and by providing stable voltage and frequency. Similar to other equipment, the intent of running the UPS system in eco mode is to increase efficiency by reducing the amount of energy consumed by the UPS. The Green Grid defines eco mode as “one of several UPS modes of operation that can improve efficiency (conserve energy) but, depending on the UPS technology, can come with possible tradeoffs in performance.”

Does running the UPS in eco mode affect the operation of the UPS, making the overall system less reliable and potentially putting the critical load at greater risk? Is there a way to use eco mode to improve efficiency without compromising performance or reliability? These are questions that must be reviewed when considering designing and operating a critical facility with eco mode. The goal of this article is to take a closer look at the different UPS operating modes and how they impact data centers and other mission critical facilities.

Electrical efficiency

Although there are different metrics used to measure efficiency in data centers, the one most commonly used is power usage effectiveness (PUE), created by the Green Grid. It compares the total data center facility’s power to the power used to operate the IT equipment. The optimum data center would have a PUE value of 1.0, where all the power going into the data center is being directly used to power the IT equipment. Any value above 1.0 means that a portion of the total facility power is being diverted to support systems, such as cooling, lighting, and the power system. The higher the PUE number, the larger portion of the power is consumed by the support systems relative to the IT equipment itself, resulting in a less efficient data center.

When designing a data center, most engineers, owners, and operators focus on the mechanical system and the ability to use free cooling to lower the PUE and increase efficiency. The electrical system, however, also wastes energy in the form of losses due to inefficiencies in the electrical equipment and distribution system. On average, electrical distribution system losses can account for 10% to 12% of the total energy consumed by the data center. That means a data center with 2 MW of IT load and a yearly average PUE of 1.45 (2.9 MW of total load) has 348 kW in electrical losses and will spend approximately $300,000 a year on wasted electrical energy. That wasted electrical energy cost in conjunction with tighter operational budgets and commitment to sustainability have forced engineers and owners to take a stronger look at electrical systems to find ways to eliminate electrical losses.

Legacy electrical distribution

In a typical legacy data center electrical distribution system, there are four components that contribute to the majority of the losses:

  • Substation transformers: transformer no-load and core losses
  • UPS: rectifier and inverter losses
  • Power distribution units (PDUs): transformer no-load and core losses
  • IT power supply: rectifier and transformer losses.

One method of reducing losses that does not affect the operation of the data center is using or replacing equipment like substation and PDU transformers with more efficient equipment. In 2005, the NEMA TP-1: Guide for Determining Energy Efficiency for Distribution Transformers was adopted, which increased minimum transformer efficiencies from about 97% to 99%, depending on the type and size of the transformer. In 2016, that minimum transformer efficiency requirement will increase by about 8% to 12% to further reduce energy consumption. Ultra-high-efficiency transformers are also available that have efficiency ratings above 99.5%.

Another method of increasing efficiency is to eliminate the equipment with the most losses. This method requires different power strategies, such as implementing higher-voltage ac and dc distribution to eliminate equipment like PDU transformers, UPS invertors, and IT power supply rectifiers. Each of these power strategies has advantages and challenges that impact the operation of the data center, so they must be evaluated when planning a data center.

A third method that manufacturers are recently promoting, and some facilities are starting to implement, involves the operation of the UPS system in some type of economical or eco mode. This mode of operation increases efficiency by eliminating the rectifier and inverter losses in the UPS.

UPS system

The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) classifies UPS systems into the following performance categories:

  • Voltage/frequency dependent (VFD): A UPS shall protect the load from power outages. The output voltage and frequency depend on the input ac source. It is not intended to provide additional corrective functions.
  • Voltage independent: A UPS shall protect the load from power outages and provide stable voltage. The output frequency depends on the input ac source. The output voltage shall remain within prescribed voltage limits (provided by additional corrective voltage functions).
  • Voltage/frequency independent (VFI): A UPS shall protect the load from power outages and provide stable voltage and stable frequency. The output voltage and frequency are independent of the input ac source.

VFD topology is commonly referred to as “offline” UPS, where the rectifier/inverter circuits are offline and not part of the normal power path. Because the losses associated with the rectifier/inverter are removed during normal operation, this mode is similar to the effect of operating a double-conversion in eco mode. In normal mode, the load on a VFD-type system is exposed to the raw utility power. These are traditionally smaller, single-phase-type UPS systems.

Figure 1: This diagram of a typical double-conversion mode UPS shows that power flows through the rectifier and inverter. All graphics courtesy: JacobsThe VFI topology is more commonly known as double-conversion or “online” UPS, where in normal operation, the rectifier/inverter circuits are online and engaged (see Figure 1). Power is converted from ac to dc in the rectifier and then from dc back to ac in the inverter. Additionally, dc power is used to charge the stored-energy medium under normal operation, and draw power from the stored-energy medium during a power outage. Different technologies can be used for the stored-energy medium including batteries and flywheels. Double-conversion UPS systems are also equipped with a static bypass path that bypasses the rectifier/inverter circuit during a fault condition. For the purpose of this article, the focus will be on the double-conversion (VFI) static UPS topology.

Traditional eco mode

In the traditional or classic eco mode, the load is normally powered through the bypass path, exposing the critical load to the raw utility power without conditioning, similar to the VFD topology (see Figure 2). The inverter is in standby and only engaged when the utility fails. Because of this, the losses in the rectifier and inverter are eliminated, making the UPS system more efficient.

Figure 2: In traditional eco mode, power flows through the bypass and the inverter is not energized.The average static double-conversion UPS system operates between 90% efficient at 30% load to about 94% efficient at 100% load. The efficiency percentage can go up or down a little depending on the technology used, and whether the UPS contains an input isolation transformer. With the elimination of the rectifier and inverter losses, the efficiency of the UPS system in eco mode can increase to 98% or 99%. In a 2N redundant-type (system + system) configuration, where the system is typically operating each UPS below 40%, that equates to about a 4% to 8% increase in efficiency. The increase in efficiency also means less heat, which reduces cooling requirements. The Green Grid estimates an average improvement of approximately 0.06 in PUE when going from double-conversion to eco mode.

<< First < Previous 1 2 Next > Last >>

Mamdouh , TX, United States, 07/09/15 02:47 PM:

The article is informative. I like to see more detailed discussion on the subject.
Anonymous , 07/15/15 09:00 AM:

VFI versus VFD is dependant on the power quality of the site. Bad power in equals bad power out. High harmonic distortion in, the same out. This can cause equipment to run hotter and cause IT equipment to have problems. The trade off, more effieient versus equipment damage, more heat, more AC.
Jozef , Non-US/Not Applicable, Poland, 07/15/15 04:05 PM:

Of course we want to use an electrical Energy as less as possible ant that is not new system. I study in years 1960-1964 and all the time we have the economical administration department who checked our project for electrical energy consumption. Today we have IT and nothing changed we all time try to save energy. In meaning time our factories still are bigger and bigger and use less energy then before. That is good but we as people need new tools and globally we use more energy. And because I pay for energy from my pocket money I am traying to use less energy then possible because I need save money for vacational trip, not to burn air.
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
Commissioning lighting control systems; 2016 Commissioning Giants; Design high-efficiency hot water systems for hospitals; Evaluating condensation and condensate
Solving HVAC challenges; Thermal comfort criteria; Liquid-immersion cooling; Specifying VRF systems; 2016 Product of the Year winners
MEP Giants; MEP Annual Report; Mergers and acquisitions; Passive, active fire protection; LED retrofits; HVAC energy efficiency
Driving motor efficiency; Preventing Arc Flash in mission critical facilities; Integrating alternative power and existing electrical systems
Putting COPS into context; Designing medium-voltage electrical systems; Planning and designing resilient, efficient data centers; The nine steps of designing generator fuel systems
Designing generator systems; Using online commissioning tools; Selective coordination best practices
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.
click me