Know when, where to specify a clean agent system

Fire protection engineers should use NPFA 2001 to direct the specification of clean agent fire extinguishing systems, which are typically used in mission critical facilities.

08/12/2015


Learning Objectives 

  • Compare and contrast clean agent fire extinguishing systems.
  • Evaluate their use and outline the codes and standards used to dictate their specification.
  • Assess the pros and cons of various clean agent systems.

Clean agent systems were initially developed to address emerging technologies related to the computer, aircraft, and marine industries. Halon 1301, one of the most common clean agents in its time, was developed in the 1960s. Its primary use was to provide fire protection to sensitive equipment related to computer mainframes and telecommunications equipment on aircraft and marine vessels. It was a very efficient means of fire protection that left no residue after discharge, and was a relatively lightweight means of suppression. As technology advanced and environmental concerns became important, the need for alternative agents became evident.

Figure 1: In this typical server room, clean agent systems are employed to ensure sensitive equipment is not destroyed in case of a fire. Courtesy: JBA Consulting EngineersModern clean agents were developed to replace earlier gaseous-based systems that had been determined to have a detrimental impact to the environment. Halon 1301 and 1211 were found to deplete ozone when exposed to the atmosphere. There was a clear need to provide alternative fire-extinguishing agents that were safer to the environment, or cleaner. Hence clean agents were developed. They are defined as an electrically nonconducting fire extinguishant that does not leave a residue upon evaporation.

In 1989, the Montreal Protocol determined that halon gases, including those used in fire-extinguishing systems, when exposed to the atmosphere caused a depletion of the ozone layer. As such, a ban was placed on the production and continued use or sale of halon-type fire-extinguishing systems. In the United States, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency banned the manufacture of halon in the mid-1990s. This caused the need to develop alternative extinguishing agents and systems. The Technical Committee on Halon Protection Options was organized in 1991 and started working to address standards for those systems replacing halon. They cited a need to develop standards on how to design, install, maintain, and operate the newer systems being developed.

As a result of the work performed by the committee and the NFPA, NFPA 2001: Standard on Clean Agent Fire Extinguishing Systems was formed. This standard provides minimum requirements for the design, installation, testing, maintenance, and operation for both total flooding and local-application clean agent systems used to protect property and equipment against fire. The standard was first published in 1994 and was developed to address alternatives to halon extinguishing systems.

Since its initial publication in 1994, the standard has been updated multiple times and 2015 is the current edition. The standard has been updated to reflect changing technologies in the manufacture of clean agents, their use, and application in fire-extinguishing systems. The current edition includes new content to address recycling and disposal of the agents and higher-pressure agents.

Governing code

NFPA standards provide criteria on how to design, install, test, maintain, and operate the systems they govern. They do not dictate when these systems are required, which is typically left to the governing building and/or fire codes. These codes will require a certain level of protection and the NFPA standards will guide those involved in how to design and install the systems. NFPA 2001 addresses the requirements for system components, system design, local application systems, inspection, testing, maintenance, and training as well as requirements for marine systems. Annex material provide additional explanatory material to support the designers, installers and users of these systems. NFPA 2001 is the standard that dictates how to design and install clean agent systems. By reference within a building or fire code, the standard becomes enforceable, as it is part of the governing codes.

Clean agent systems are typically used to protect sensitive electronic equipment or valuable property and equipment against fire. They can be used in conjunction with, or as a replacement for, water-based systems. Because the agent does not leave a residue after application, it can limit the damage caused by other types of extinguishing systems and is easier to return to normal operations because cleanup time is reduced. Clean agent systems are very common in protecting data-processing centers or rooms where computer equipment and servers are present. Clean agent systems can be a valuable tool in protecting sensitive electronic equipment or valuable property and equipment.

Sprinkler systems

Figure 2: Server rooms typically are protected by clean agent systems. Courtesy: JBA Consulting EngineersMany of the model building and fire codes require automatic sprinkler systems to protect the building based on the use and size of the building. They do permit alternative extinguishing systems in lieu of sprinklers under certain conditions. The International Building Code (IBC) 2012 edition allows alternative systems under Section 904. This section references NFPA 2001 when clean agent systems are to be provided as part of the protection for the building. The use of these systems requires the approval of the fire code official, as they are considered alternative systems in the code. It also should be noted that their use may not allow other exceptions or reductions permitted by code for sprinkler protection. Therefore, the designer must carefully examine the application of the alternative system and make sure it does not impact other design components.

When complete automatic sprinkler protection is required by code, there are certain options that a designer of clean agent systems can use. One includes the application of only a clean agent system for the room to be protected, and a fire-resistance rating around the room to reduce impact to a fire from this room to the remainder of the building. If the room is relatively small with respect to the overall size of the building, this option could be used to protect the space and still obtain reductions and exceptions for the overall building because limited areas of the building are not protected by sprinklers. This approach should be specifically discussed and agreed upon with the fire code official.

The second option is to use a clean agent system in conjunction with a water-based sprinkler system to protect the space. The water-based system gives a code-compliant approach to providing automatic sprinklers for all areas of the building, or a fully sprinklered building. This option should be explored when full automatic sprinkler protection is required and the use of the clean agent system in lieu of sprinklers is not allowed. The clean agent system gives a first line of defense against a fire that, if extinguished, should not actuate the water-based system. If fire growth continues, the water-based system will provide protection of the building.

It is not uncommon for a pre-action sprinkler system to meet the automatic sprinkler system code requirements and then supplement a clean agent system for protection of the equipment. The pre-action system does not have water in the system prior to activation, thus mitigating the potential for water damage. The pre-action system can be designed to require two detection components to operate before the water is released into the room. This can be a combination of smoke detection and sprinkler actuation. If only one actuates, water is not released. The clean agent system can be designed to use the smoke-detection system to release the agent and provide a first line of protection, thereby protecting the equipment or valuable property before the water-based system releases to protect the overall building.


<< First < Previous 1 2 Next > Last >>

Nazr , Nunavut, Pakistan, 08/19/15 06:28 AM:

Useful information to consider when planning a fire suppression system.
Mamdouh , TX, United States, 08/19/15 11:03 AM:

Nice article but lacks details on what is available
Iswar , MT, India, 08/19/15 09:44 PM:

Per section 23.11.8 of NFPA 72 "Suppression systems or groups of systems shall be controlled by a single releasing service fire alarm control unit that monitors the associated initiating device(s), actuates the associated releasing device(s), and controls the associated agent release notification appliances." Does it mean that initiating devices connected to a Protected Premises Fire Alarm Panel cannot be used to provide verified fire alarm signal to the Release Panel?
Anonymous , 08/25/15 01:30 PM:

Discussions appear accurate; for clarity, the following comments are offered; (1)NFPA 2001 Clean Agent Fire Suppression System is typically provided in mission-critical facilities with emphasis on Compartments containing Electronic Computer/Data Processing Equipment (NFPA 75) (2)This NFPA 2001 system is for protection of the contents while NFPA 13 sprinkler is for protection of the structure; therefore the clean agent system should not be considered as a substitute for the sprinkler system.
Anonymous , 08/25/15 01:54 PM:

The following paragraph in the article appears misleading. "When complete automatic sprinkler protection is required by code, there are certain options that a designer of clean agent systems can use. One includes the application of only a clean agent system for the room to be protected, and a fire-resistance rating around the room to reduce impact to a fire from this room to the remainder of the building. If the room is relatively small with respect to the overall size of the building, this option could be used to protect the space and still obtain reductions and exceptions for the overall building because limited areas of the building are not protected by sprinklers. This approach should be specifically discussed and agreed upon with the fire code official."..... (1) Once a Building (by Building Code and/or Fire Code)is required to have sprinkler protection, the sprinkler protection shall be provided 'throughout' per NFPA 13. The NFPA 13 allowed omission of sprinkler is in dry electrical equipment rooms that is not used for any storage, and the Electrical Room is enclosed by a 2 hour fire rated enclosure. (2) Building and Fire Codes provide the minimum requirements. All are encouraged to fully comply with the applicable codes, and not to go below the minimum, even when the local Authority Having Jurisdiction concurs with the proposed/negotiated exception or reduction in the level of fire protection. (3) NFPA 2001 Clean Agent System is not a substitute for sprinkler. It is intended to protect the contents while sprinkler is to protect the structure of the rooms.
Mohammed , KS, Saudi Arabia, 10/08/15 06:15 AM:

New updates to Codes doesn't well address to green/sustainable/Leed buildings specifications.
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
Combined heat and power; Assessing replacement of electrical systems; Energy codes and lighting; Salary Survey; Fan efficiency
Commissioning lighting control systems; 2016 Commissioning Giants; Design high-efficiency hot water systems for hospitals; Evaluating condensation and condensate
Solving HVAC challenges; Thermal comfort criteria; Liquid-immersion cooling; Specifying VRF systems; 2016 Product of the Year winners
Driving motor efficiency; Preventing Arc Flash in mission critical facilities; Integrating alternative power and existing electrical systems
Putting COPS into context; Designing medium-voltage electrical systems; Planning and designing resilient, efficient data centers; The nine steps of designing generator fuel systems
Designing generator systems; Using online commissioning tools; Selective coordination best practices
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.
click me