Wind-Power Backers Seek New Planning Ideas


The Atlantic coastline offers great potential for offshore wind farms, but as wind-power developers in Cape Cod and Nantucket Island are finding, the area also features more than its share of hot air. Now a new consortium, bringing together government, universities and private industry, is working to develop a framework for developing wind-power projects that make economic—and regulatory—sense.

The effort is being led by the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative , the state's development agency for renewable energy, along with turbine manufacturer General Electric and the U.S. Dept. of Energy (DOE). Also involved are experts from the University of Massachusetts , the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, MIT and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers , among others. Those involved say developing a credible permitting process is essential to success.

The battle over the proposed $900 million Cape Wind project, which would place 130 wind turbines in Nantucket Sound , shows just how difficult permitting is today. Nantucket property owners are fighting the project, which would generate up to 457 MW of electricity, arguing the turbines would damage scenic vistas—and property values—in the upscale resort community. Both sides are now engaged in a billboard war along Boston-area expressways.

In contrast, a proposed 40-turbine project off the coast of Long Island is progressing smoothly. Although developers at the Long Island Power Authority began planning the $300 million, 140-MW effort several years after Cape Wind began its fight, a smoother permitting process means its turbines could be turning by late 2008.

The Massachusetts effort, if successful, could help enable a significant boost in U.S. wind-power production. The DOE has estimated offshore wind-power capacity at 900,000 MW, with New England and the Mid-Atlantic coasts offering the greatest potential. GE estimates that this could translate into a $10 billion industry if the permitting process can be made more predictable and transparent.

Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
Exploring fire pumps and systems; Lighting energy codes; Salary survey; Changes to NFPA 20
How to use IPD; 2017 Commissioning Giants; CFDs and harmonic mitigation; Eight steps to determine plumbing system requirements
2017 MEP Giants; Mergers and acquisitions report; ASHRAE 62.1; LEED v4 updates and tips; Understanding overcurrent protection
Power system design for high-performance buildings; mitigating arc flash hazards
Transformers; Electrical system design; Selecting and sizing transformers; Grounded and ungrounded system design, Paralleling generator systems
Commissioning electrical systems; Designing emergency and standby generator systems; VFDs in high-performance buildings
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.
Automation Engineer; Wood Group
System Integrator; Cross Integrated Systems Group
Fire & Life Safety Engineer; Technip USA Inc.
This course focuses on climate analysis, appropriateness of cooling system selection, and combining cooling systems.
This course will help identify and reveal electrical hazards and identify the solutions to implementing and maintaining a safe work environment.
This course explains how maintaining power and communication systems through emergency power-generation systems is critical.
click me