Keeping the Lights On in California

California electricity consumers have themselves to thank for the fact that their lights stayed on during the summer of 2001, claims a new study, despite dire predictions of rolling blackouts. Even though temperatures were almost indistinguishable from those of the disastrous previous summer—and the economy actually grew during the period— electricity service was not significantly ...

09/01/2002


California electricity consumers have themselves to thank for the fact that their lights stayed on during the summer of 2001, claims a new study, despite dire predictions of rolling blackouts. Even though temperatures were almost indistinguishable from those of the disastrous previous summer—and the economy actually grew during the period— electricity service was not significantly disrupted.

The study, completed by the U.S. Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, concludes that consumers reduced peak demand by 3,000 to 5,500 MW by installing more energy-efficient equipment and embracing conservation measures.

The North American Electric Reliability Council had predicted in April 2001 that Californians would face about 250 hours of rolling blackouts during that upcoming summer, with costs ranging up to $20 billion. Instead, a combination of factors—including increased media awareness, rising energy prices and utility and state efficiency programs—led consumers to install more energy-efficient equipment and on-site generation, as well as to modify their consumption habits.

California had programs in place to encourage efficiency, says the study, fostering consumer energy conservation. For example, the state of California rebated 20% on electricity bills if consumers achieved a 20% reduction in electricity use—an offer renewed this past summer. A willingness to make energy reductions a priority through initiatives such as this one will make future cutbacks easier if a similar crisis arises, researchers say.

From Pure Power, Fall 2002





Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
How to use IPD; 2017 Commissioning Giants; CFDs and harmonic mitigation; Eight steps to determine plumbing system requirements
2017 MEP Giants; Mergers and acquisitions report; ASHRAE 62.1; LEED v4 updates and tips; Understanding overcurrent protection
Integrating electrical and HVAC for energy efficiency; Mixed-use buildings; ASHRAE 90.4; Wireless fire alarms assessment and challenges
Power system design for high-performance buildings; mitigating arc flash hazards
Transformers; Electrical system design; Selecting and sizing transformers; Grounded and ungrounded system design, Paralleling generator systems
Commissioning electrical systems; Designing emergency and standby generator systems; VFDs in high-performance buildings
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.
Automation Engineer; Wood Group
System Integrator; Cross Integrated Systems Group
Fire & Life Safety Engineer; Technip USA Inc.
This course focuses on climate analysis, appropriateness of cooling system selection, and combining cooling systems.
This course will help identify and reveal electrical hazards and identify the solutions to implementing and maintaining a safe work environment.
This course explains how maintaining power and communication systems through emergency power-generation systems is critical.
click me