7×24 Conference Hits on Key Data Center Issues


Data center owners, operators, designers and vendors recently converged in Orlando for the annual 7×24 Conference. While a disparate group, all had one question on their minds: How does the industry deal with server power loads starting to creep up to almost 20 kW per rack with a not-so-distant potential load of up to 50 or 60 kW per rack?

First, savvy designers must learn how to use computational fluid dynamic modeling. CFD, according to Suhas Patankar, Ph.D., who presented on the topic, can be employed to simulate airflow within mission-critical environments to ensure that all servers are being provided with enough cool air.

Improper or low CFM levels can cause serious heating issues for the racks. Servers, said Patankar, are typically arranged in "hot/cold aisle" configurations where cold air is typically pulled from a raised floor through the front of the server rack housing and exits near the top and rear of the rack. The front is the cold aisle and the back is the hot aisle. As the velocity of air slows down from the computer room air-conditioner (CRAC) units under the raised floor to the perforated tiles below the racks, the pressure changes. Oddly, according to Patankar, air moving through the tiles furthest away from the CRAC unit have the most pressure.

Improper or low CFM levels will cause cross-flow of the hot air back into the cold aisle. The importance of proper modeling of the air dynamics becomes more critical with the higher densities forecast for the near future. Patankar argued it is far better to try to effectively simulate the proposed installation prior to construction than to try to fix design issues after construction is complete.

An interesting observation on energy savings for data centers was proferred by EYP MCF's William Kosik, who noted that increasing the chilled-water temperature from 45°F to 55°F increases the supply air in a data center floor from 55°F to 65°F—in other words, allowing a near 25% reduction in kW per ton. These savings are, of course, not free; the return-air temperature after cooling the servers is higher. These higher temperatures will require better airflow management and good layout of hot/cold aisles within the data center floor. But with the sheer amount of energy utilized in a data center, energy-saving measures can provide significant monetary savings to the owner and operators.

In another outside-the-box HVAC design session, given by Ronald Johanning, P.E., of Affiliated Engineers, and Guy Hutchins and David Leather barrow, both of Trox AITCS, the presenters argued for a new cooling solution: CO 2 . In a typical air-cooled data center, such systems, they claimed, are often limited to a maximum cooling of only 5 to 8 kW per rack. Alternatively, water-based solutions, while slightly better, are still limited to less than 20 kW per rack. CO 2 , according to the presenters, can provide cooling for densities that exceed 20 kW per rack. In fact, the Trox representatives presented a case study where CO 2 was used to cool a rack with a density of 30 kW. There was even some discussion about optimizing this system to cool up to 40 to 50 watts per rack. Furthermore, the CO 2 proponents pointed out that the cooling source is electrically benign and the cooling system itself can utilize smaller pipe diameters. Adequate infrastructure and proper planning, of course, are equally critical.

One of the drivers increasing power/cooling densities is the industry's gravitation toward virtual servers, which provide for clustering of real servers. While on the surface there appears to be some consolidation of servers, the actual service duty of the servers can significantly increase, in some estimations, as much 10% to 90%. This increase in actual operating time or load factor of the server could exacerbate already intensified power and cooling issues.

Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
Exploring fire pumps and systems; Lighting energy codes; Salary survey; Changes to NFPA 20
How to use IPD; 2017 Commissioning Giants; CFDs and harmonic mitigation; Eight steps to determine plumbing system requirements
2017 MEP Giants; Mergers and acquisitions report; ASHRAE 62.1; LEED v4 updates and tips; Understanding overcurrent protection
Power system design for high-performance buildings; mitigating arc flash hazards
Transformers; Electrical system design; Selecting and sizing transformers; Grounded and ungrounded system design, Paralleling generator systems
Commissioning electrical systems; Designing emergency and standby generator systems; VFDs in high-performance buildings
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.
Automation Engineer; Wood Group
System Integrator; Cross Integrated Systems Group
Fire & Life Safety Engineer; Technip USA Inc.
This course focuses on climate analysis, appropriateness of cooling system selection, and combining cooling systems.
This course will help identify and reveal electrical hazards and identify the solutions to implementing and maintaining a safe work environment.
This course explains how maintaining power and communication systems through emergency power-generation systems is critical.
click me