100 Envelopes, please: The 2008 MEP design giants

The numbers are in. The computers are turned off. And with the MEP engineering community sweating with anticipation as to which firms made the cut, Consulting-Specifying Engineer is proud to announce the Giants 100 list for 2008, i.e., those with the most MEP design revenue in the previous year.


The numbers are in. The computers are turned off. And with the MEP engineering community

Download the PDF of the 2008 Giants 100.

sweating with anticipation as to which firms made the cut, Consulting-Specifying Engineer is proud to announce the Giants 100 list for 2008, i.e., those with the most MEP design revenue in the previous year.

Comparing so many diverse firms with a wide range of accounting procedures is challenging. For one thing, while some of the listed firms are engaged exclusively in MEP design work, many others are A/E firms or turnkey design-build firms providing MEP design services as a subset of their offerings. For example, AECOM Technology Corp., Los Angeles, reported total a revenue of $4.28 billion and a total design revenue of $3.46 billion. The MEP design revenue was reported as 19% of the total design revenue, which calculated to an MEP design revenue of $656.89 million, putting them at the top of the Giants 100 for 2008.

Because participating in the Giants 100 survey is voluntary and subject to the availability of the data from the previous calendar or fiscal year, some firms choose not to participate or are simply unable to do so. Therefore, while the revenue for MEP design is substantial, there is more out there than reported in the survey.

Giant revenues

Giants 100 firms rang up $4.58 billion in MEP design revenue in the previous year and approximately $18.51 billion in total revenue. There are five new entries to the top 10: AECOM Technology Corp.; POWER Engineers, Hailey, Idaho; The Benham Companies, Oklahoma City; STV Group, Douglassville, Pa.; and Stantec, Edmonton, Alberta.

The most dramatic change to the Giants 100 is the entry of AECOM Technology Corp. Having never participated before, AECOM Technology commanded the Giants 100 list as the top firm, overtaking 2007's No. 1 firm, URS Corp., despite URS having outstanding MEP revenue growth of $167.78 million over the previous year.

While some of this revenue growth is surely organic, substantial merger and acquisition activity is occurring in the AEC industry. This year's Giants 100 firms disclosed some notable changes: URS Corp. acquired Washington Group International; Stantec acquired 18 firms, including RHL Design Group; TLC Engineering for Architecture, Orlando, acquired Piazza Engineering, Dallas; and ARCADIS-US, Highlands Ranch, Colo., acquired RTKL, Baltimore, as a wholly owned subsidiary. Carter & Burgess, which was ranked No. 6 on the Giants 100 list in 2007 with a total revenue of more than $498 million and an MEP revenue of $109 million, was acquired by Jacobs; the resulting firm name is Jacobs Carter Burgess, Ft. Worth, Texas. Jacobs Carter Burgess did not participate in the Giants 100 survey.

Giant employers

Giants 100 firms are significant for the number of engineers they employ: 39,364 in total, 16,118 of whom are MEP engineers. See Table 2 for top employers of MEP engineers. Historically, Consulting-Specifying Engineer has broken out structural engineers (3,942 reported in 2008), but not fire-protection engineers, which we'll include in the 2009 survey.

What giants do

Table 3 shows where the bulk of project work occurred among Giants 100 firms. Consulting-Specifying Engineer asked each firm to allocate 100% of its revenues across new construction; renovation/retrofit; maintenance, repair, and operations; and commissioning projects. Twelve of the firms did not answer the question. Among those that did, 56% derive more than 50% of their revenue from new construction, and 24% derive more than 50% of their revenue from renovations/retrofits. Table 3 also shows that 59% of the participating firms provide some level of commissioning services. Two firms (EMC Engineers, Lakewood, Colo., and Sebesta Blomberg, Roseville, Minn.) are the most heavily committed to commissioning.

Although they are large, Giants 100 firms do not do everything in-house. Figure 1 shows what work Giants 100 firms tend to have performed by subcontractors.

Although there is little change from 2007 to 2008, note that acoustics subcontracting increased from 50% to 57% of Giants 100 firms. These firms could be shrugging off the next big growth market for engineering.

Researchers at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore reported in the “Archives of Internal Medicine” (July 28, 2008) that 33% of U.S. adults have some degree of hearing loss, with approximately 29 million of them having trouble discerning speech.

With baby boomers aging and the use of personal listening devices increasing among the younger generations, engineering indoor spaces to respond to or prevent hearing loss is likely to influence MEP designs.

The software side of Giants

Consulting-Specifying Engineer asked participating firms note if they used software in five categories: CAD, BIM, energy analysis, project management, and computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Twelve firms did not answer the question. Of those that answered, 100% use CAD; 88% use BIM; 85% use energy-analysis software; 74% use software for project management or collaboration; and 48% use software for CFD. Furthermore, approximately 27% of Giants 100 firms responding to the software question use all five classes.

Regarding BIM, the software question was not precise enough to link BIM to MEP use. For example, AEC firms may use BIM for architecture, but not for MEP. However, linking their software answers to total revenue reported, firms representing $10.56 billion are using BIM to some degree, and firms representing $2.16 billion are not. These figures do not include the revenue reported by firms that did not answer the software question.

Asked to name other software they used, the most frequent entries were for electrical-distribution design/analysis and lighting design.

Giants 100 firm ranking Name of firm MEP revenue (in millions) Giants 100 ranking previous year
1AECOM Technology Corp.$ 656.89Did not participate
2URS Corporation$ 489.501
3Burns & McDonnell$ 276.002
4Burns and Roe Group$ 179.934
5Syska Hennessy Group Inc.$ 151.317
6POWER Engineers$ 145.7015
7Parsons Brinckerhoff$ 128.865
8The Benham Companies LLC$ 112.7016
9STV Group Inc.$ 100.2413

Giants 100 ranking Name of firm Number of MEP engineers
2URS Corporation2,986
7Parsons Brinckerhoff1,841
1AECOM Technology Corp.1,647
3Burns & McDonnell695
10Stantec Inc.616
5Syska Hennessy Group Inc.402
14AKF Engineers LP340
35Middough Inc.323
23EYP Mission Critical Facilities, a company of HP255

Percentage of revenue from types of projects
Type of project0 or NA1-1011-3031-5051-7576-100
New construction13012263613
Maintain/repair/operate (MRO)67247200

Green giants

This is the first year Consulting-Specifying Engineer is reporting the level of activity Giants 100 firms have with green buildings. Editors used the number of U.S. Green Building Council LEED accredited professionals (LEED APs) employed by the firm as an indicator of commitment to garnering green-building contracts. The number of LEED APs is an indicator of a firm's commitment to the green market because there are costs for preparing for and taking the LEED AP exam. However, the number of LEED APs does not necessarily imply how green thecompany is or how well it performs on green projects. That said, the total number of LEED APs employed by Giants 100 firms is 4,042, which accounts for almost 8% of the nation's 51,452 LEED APs at the time Consulting-Specifying Engineer compiled the survey results. The editors noted that many firms had dozens of LEED APs on staff, so they created a histogram showing the distribution of LEED APs employed by Giants 100 firms (Figure 2). Table 4 lists the 11 Giants 100 firms that have 100 or more LEED APs on staff.

Giants 100 Ranking Name of Firm Number LEED APs in firm
10Stantec Inc.325
1AECOM Technology Corp.216
31Cannon Design140
12DLR Group135
2URS Corporation113
27HGA Architects and Engineers103

Product of the Year
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
40 Under Forty: Get Recognized
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
MEP Giants Program
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
October 2018
Approaches to building engineering, 2018 Commissioning Giants, integrated project delivery, improving construction efficiency, an IPD primer, collaborative projects, NFPA 13 sprinkler systems.
September 2018
Power boiler control, Product of the Year, power generation,and integration and interoperability
August 2018
MEP Giants, lighting designs, circuit protection, ventilation systems, and more
Data Centers: Impacts of Climate and Cooling Technology
This course focuses on climate analysis, appropriateness of cooling system selection, and combining cooling systems.
Safety First: Arc Flash 101
This course will help identify and reveal electrical hazards and identify the solutions to implementing and maintaining a safe work environment.
Critical Power: Hospital Electrical Systems
This course explains how maintaining power and communication systems through emergency power-generation systems is critical.
Data Center Design
Data centers, data closets, edge and cloud computing, co-location facilities, and similar topics are among the fastest-changing in the industry.
click me