Wind-Power Backers Seek New Planning Ideas


The Atlantic coastline offers great potential for offshore wind farms, but as wind-power developers in Cape Cod and Nantucket Island are finding, the area also features more than its share of hot air. Now a new consortium, bringing together government, universities and private industry, is working to develop a framework for developing wind-power projects that make economic—and regulatory—sense.

The effort is being led by the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative , the state's development agency for renewable energy, along with turbine manufacturer General Electric and the U.S. Dept. of Energy (DOE). Also involved are experts from the University of Massachusetts , the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, MIT and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers , among others. Those involved say developing a credible permitting process is essential to success.

The battle over the proposed $900 million Cape Wind project, which would place 130 wind turbines in Nantucket Sound , shows just how difficult permitting is today. Nantucket property owners are fighting the project, which would generate up to 457 MW of electricity, arguing the turbines would damage scenic vistas—and property values—in the upscale resort community. Both sides are now engaged in a billboard war along Boston-area expressways.

In contrast, a proposed 40-turbine project off the coast of Long Island is progressing smoothly. Although developers at the Long Island Power Authority began planning the $300 million, 140-MW effort several years after Cape Wind began its fight, a smoother permitting process means its turbines could be turning by late 2008.

The Massachusetts effort, if successful, could help enable a significant boost in U.S. wind-power production. The DOE has estimated offshore wind-power capacity at 900,000 MW, with New England and the Mid-Atlantic coasts offering the greatest potential. GE estimates that this could translate into a $10 billion industry if the permitting process can be made more predictable and transparent.

No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
Designing for energy efficiency; Understanding and applying NFPA 101 for mission critical facilities; Integrating commissioning and testing for fire alarm systems; Optimizing unitary pumping solutions
Economics of HVAC systems; NFPA 110-2016; Designing and choosing modular data centers
Combined heat and power; Assessing replacement of electrical systems; Energy codes and lighting; Salary Survey; Fan efficiency
Tying a microgrid to the smart grid; Paralleling generator systems; Previewing NEC 2017 changes
Driving motor efficiency; Preventing Arc Flash in mission critical facilities; Integrating alternative power and existing electrical systems
Putting COPS into context; Designing medium-voltage electrical systems; Planning and designing resilient, efficient data centers; The nine steps of designing generator fuel systems
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.
click me