Tips and Tricks: How to ruggedize an embedded control system

10 tips for making rugged control systems include knowing the end user of the product, how the product will be used, and operating conditions. Which are the most important attributes, and which one requires the most careful consideration?

07/20/2011


Morey provides electronic manufacturing services, and, among products, offers ruggedized controllers with many options. Photo courtesy: Morey Corp.Important tips for ruggedizing embedded control systems include knowing the end user of the product, how the product will be used, and operating conditions. Below the list, learn which attributes are most important and which one requires the most critical consideration.

  1. Who is the end user of the product?
  2. How will the product be used?
  3. What are (or will be) the conditions that the product will be exposed to?
  4. Where will the product be placed or located?
  5. What types of physical connections will be required?
  6. What materials should be considered in the design of the product?
  7. How will it be secured or attached?
  8. What level of testing and what specific tests will be required?
  9. When will the product be first installed?
  10. How and how often will it need to be accessed?

When ruggedizing an embedded system for use in automation, controls, or instrumentation, which of the attributes above are most important and why?

How the product will be used and the conditions to which the product will be exposed are the key elements when ruggedizing a design. The first part (usage) defines the parameters of expectation; the designer should insist on understanding how the end customer will be expected to use the product. Although the product itself may not require human interaction on a regular basis, it will require human manipulation during its lifetime. That manipulation will take many forms:

  • Manufacturability: Someone has to be able to build it.
  • Installation: Someone has to be able to install, mount, and connect to it. For large volumes this may have to be repeated many times in a day.
  • Usage: One way or another and at some point someone will have to interface with the product.
  • Serviceability: The device will need to be serviced; access to it while maintaining integrity of the design (at times in the field) will need careful consideration.

The second part (exposure) indicates the practical side of design. If the customer’s specification calls for a design that is water resistant, but the end user plans to attach the product to the bottom of a boat, then that, and not the specification, should be the primary consideration. In such cases it will be up to the designer to push back and have the specifications changed to meet the expected performance. Many good designs have failed in the field by adhering strictly to the customer’s requirements without challenge.

Tip number 8, involving “specific tests,” isn’t among the “most important” for various reasons, primarily because blindly requesting specific tests (or blanket tests) without knowing the aforementioned items is pointless. It will add unnecessary costs and potential bulk to the product.  Invariably it will miss the mark with the end customer by being too expensive or too big.

Also, test specifications are at times used as a “cover all bases” method.  It can be a wonderful thing to follow but also can be a dangerous road when taken as gospel without deep understanding of its intended application. Often customers will ask for a specific test standard to be followed “to the letter, and in its entirety.” Just because there is a test for the survivability of a product if it is thrown out of an airplane at 35,000 ft, doesn’t mean you have to design the product to adhere to it. The best design rule is to observe how a product will be used and push like mad to have the customer understand it.

- Emad Isaac, CTO for Morey Corp., provider of electronic manufacturing services.

www.moreycorp.com



No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
Water use efficiency: Diminishing water quality, escalating costs; Lowering building energy use; Power for fire pumps
Building envelope and integration; Manufacturing industrial Q&A; NFPA 99; Testing fire systems
Labs and research facilities: Q&A with the experts; Water heating systems; Smart building integration; 40 Under 40 winners
Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Protecting standby generators for mission critical facilities; Selecting energy-efficient transformers; Integrating power monitoring systems; Mitigating harmonics in electrical systems
Commissioning electrical systems in mission critical facilities; Anticipating the Smart Grid; Mitigating arc flash hazards in medium-voltage switchgear; Comparing generator sizing software
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.