Solar design strategies: passive versus active

This article compares passive versus active solar design strategies and explores the differences between the various types of solar panels.

02/28/2017


Basic terminology. Courtesy: PageTwo of Page's sustainability experts, Mackenzie Manson and Joanna Yaghooti, recently collaborated on a brief overview of the use of solar energy as part of an overall strategy to conserve resources and promote energy independence. This article compares passive versus active solar design strategies and explores the differences between the various types of solar panels.

Passive design

Passive solar is a design strategy focused on the thoughtful design of windows, walls and floors to collect and distribute solar energy in a building. This simple strategy requires little to no mechanical or electrical systems (and no moving parts). Vernacular architecture is well-known for its intuitive use of passive solar design. 

Passive solar strategies include orienting the building in response to the sun’s path, shading the building, using materials with favorable thermal-mass properties for the climate, and designing the interior spaces of the building to assist in effectively heating and cooling the building naturally. Passive solar technologies reduce the building’s reliance on mechanical and electrical systems to heat, cool and light the building. It is a foundation on which high-performance buildings are conceived.

Solar energy usage design. Courtesy: PageActive design

Active solar technology uses equipment to convert solar energy into usable electricity or to heat water for process or domestic use in the building. These technologies are steadily evolving and their efficiency is improving rapidly. 

Competitive pricing from the fall of 2014 puts a typical roof-mounted installation at approximately $3 to $3.50/W (inclusive of material, labor, inverters, mounting and electrical, but exclusive of incentives and rebates).  A typical mid-rise office building (approximately 130,000 gsf) can expect to install an array comprising 154 250w panels for approximately $115,000 (before rebates). Depending on the building’s load profile, a system at this scale can be expected to mitigate up to 6% to 10% of the building’s energy demand. Regional variations can greatly affect production and installation costs.

Passive design considerations

  • Microclimate
  • Taking into consideration that buildings in humid environments require different passive strategies than buildings in an arid climate
  • Building orientation
  • Positioning the long side of a building in a north-south orientation whenever possible
  • Fenestration orientation
  • Sizing and configuring windows to minimize heat loss
  • Shading windows to further minimize heat loss
  • Thermal mass
  • Designing solid walls with thermal properties that follow vernacular rules regarding storage and release of heat. 

Active design considerations

  • Designing large, unobstructed roofs or ground areas ideal for photovoltaic panel arrays. Trees, mechanical units and other buildings should not shade the panels at any time.
  • Determining the optimal solar panel installation angle. Panels typically produce the most energy when tilted at an angle equal to the latitude of the sun at that specific location.
  • For buildings with smaller floor plates, installing panels on parking structures or covered parking pavilions.
  • Installing an energy dashboard for tracking and displaying the array’s performance. The energy dashboard also educates the building occupants on how their behaviors impact building performance.

This article originally appeared on Page’s blog. Page is a CFE Media content partner.



No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
BIM coordination; MEP projects; NFPA 13; Data center Q&A; Networked lighting controls; 2017 Product of the Year finalists
Emergency lighting; NFPA 3 and 4; Integrated building systems; Smart lighting, HVAC design
Designing for energy efficiency; Understanding and applying NFPA 101 for mission critical facilities; Integrating commissioning and testing for fire alarm systems; Optimizing unitary pumping solutions
Tying a microgrid to the smart grid; Paralleling generator systems; Previewing NEC 2017 changes
Driving motor efficiency; Preventing Arc Flash in mission critical facilities; Integrating alternative power and existing electrical systems
Putting COPS into context; Designing medium-voltage electrical systems; Planning and designing resilient, efficient data centers; The nine steps of designing generator fuel systems
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.
Automation Engineer; Wood Group
System Integrator; Cross Integrated Systems Group
Fire & Life Safety Engineer; Technip USA Inc.
click me