Sensor-actuator wireless industrial network technologies

When deciding among wireless industrial networking technologies, remember that there are different kinds of wireless. For industrial applications, there are at least four, and two are compared in the radar graphic shown.

05/22/2012


When deciding among wireless industrial networking technologies, remember that there are different kinds of wireless. For industrial applications, there are at least four, and two are compared in the graphic shown. (The other two are computer standards like Wi-Fi or Bluetooth and long-distance radio as used with RTUs.)

Radar chart estimates differences between wireless sensor and actuator networks for factory automation and process automation plotting suitability across 12 logarithmic axes. Courtesy: PI (Profibus and Profinet International), www.profibus.com

For actuator/sensor level wireless as compared in the graph, there are two unique application spaces: factory automation and process automation.

Compared to factory automation, wireless networks in process environments are characterized by slower update times and higher power requirements (though used intermittently). Wireless process devices are often powered by batteries or scavenged power (power generated by vibration, for example). Process wireless technologies are transitioning from proprietary to WirelessHART and ISA100.

Wireless factory automation sensors and actuators are often called upon to cycle with millisecond update times. These devices can be powered by the radio waves. Factory automation wireless uses proprietary technology today, but PI (Profibus and Profinet International) is developing a standard that uses the IO-Link protocol wirelessly.

Often wireless process and wireless factory devices are installed where Wi-Fi and Bluetooth are in use. Because the wireless spectrum is a limited resource, attention must be paid to avoid interference. A wireless site survey is a good starting point.

- Carl Henning is deputy director, PI North America, Profibus and Profinet, in North America (formerly PTO); Edited by Mark T. Hoske, content manager CFE Media, Control Engineering, Plant Engineering, and Consulting-Specifying Engineer. He can be reached at mhoske@cfemedia.com.

www.us.profibus.com 

www.AllThingsProfinet.com 

www.bluetooth.org

www.Wi-Fi.org

www.wirelessHart.org 

www.isa.org/isa100

http://controleng.com/wireless

http://controleng.com/networks



No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
Pump technology design: Selecting pumps and pipes; Class A office buildings; NFPA 101-2015; ASHRAE 90.1 updates; Motors, drives, and HVAC efficiency
Renewable power systems: Designing a net zero energy building; NFPA 37; Data center design; Lighting systems
Salary survey: How much are you worth?; Dedicated outdoor air systems; Energy models and lighting
Understanding transfer switch operation; Coordinating protective devices; Analyzing NEC 2014 changes; Cooling data centers
Designing positive-energy buildings; Ensuring power quality; Complying with NFPA 110; Minimizing arc flash hazards
Implementing microgrids: Controlling campus power generation; Understanding cogeneration systems; Evaluating UPS system efficiency; Driving data center PUE, efficiency
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.