Selecting a control system

As capabilities of different platforms overlap in more areas, selection options grow but become more complicated.

07/31/2012


As process control engineers, we are constantly faced with having to choose a type of control system that is a best fit for the application. If you’re an end user, you probably will not need to make this kind of selection as often as we do, so you might not keep up-to-date with the latest technologies. There are many types and manufacturers out there to choose from, and careful consideration must be taken when deciding what type of system to implement into an automatic control application, especially since these systems will often remain in place for many years. A bad decision could haunt you for a long time.

There has been much discussion through the years on this topic; in the beginning, there were many definable differences between programmable logic controllers (PLCs) and distributed control systems (DCSs), but that gap has narrowed through the years. In the early years, a DCS was primarily used for analog control and a PLC handled the discrete control. However the new systems are much more compatible and interlaced than most engineers are aware of. For example, some PLC manufacturers provide DCS controllers that fit in their PLC rack and replace the PLC processor. These similarities and interrelations need to be considered and explored before making a final decision on the implementation of a control system.

Today, there is a great deal of control information available. Engineers need to do their research, be knowledgeable of each type of control system, and have a good understanding of how and when to use each type of control system. Design-critical decisions should not be based on personal opinions formed on an overabundance of sales pitches and recommendations by so called “experts” in the field. Rather, these decisions should be based on solid knowledge of the process, the control methods available, and the control methods most suitable for their applications.

Some factors that should be considered in these decisions are initial cost, expandability, spare part availability, ease of implementation, longevity, application, location, environments, I/O types and counts, specialty modules, programming options, vendor support, performance guarantee, etc. The better informed one is, the better the chance of implementing the best type of control system for your application. Never forget that control system selection can be a “once in a generation” decision for many facilities. Depending on how you implement the project, the engineer making these decisions may not be at the facility or associated with the project once the equipment is up and running. In any case, the operators running the equipment and the overall performance of the equipment or process will either benefit or suffer based on the original design and the decisions made by the engineers for many years to come. 

This post was written by Art Howell. Art is a senior engineer at MAVERICK Technologies, a leading system integrator providing industrial automation, operational support and control systems engineering services in the manufacturing and process industries. MAVERICK delivers expertise and consulting in a wide variety of areas including industrial automation controls, distributed control systems, manufacturing execution systems, operational strategy, and business process optimization. The company provides a full range of automation and controls services – ranging from PID controller tuning and HMI programming to serving as a main automation contractor. Additionally MAVERICK offers industrial and technical staffing services, placing on-site automation, instrumentation and controls engineers.

Also read: Buy or build your process control system



No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
Water use efficiency: Diminishing water quality, escalating costs; Lowering building energy use; Power for fire pumps
Building envelope and integration; Manufacturing industrial Q&A; NFPA 99; Testing fire systems
Labs and research facilities: Q&A with the experts; Water heating systems; Smart building integration; 40 Under 40 winners
Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Protecting standby generators for mission critical facilities; Selecting energy-efficient transformers; Integrating power monitoring systems; Mitigating harmonics in electrical systems
Commissioning electrical systems in mission critical facilities; Anticipating the Smart Grid; Mitigating arc flash hazards in medium-voltage switchgear; Comparing generator sizing software
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.