Protecting Against Arc Flash Hazard at a Gas Processing Plant

04/23/2007


Shell Canada faced a variety of arc flash challenges at its Burnt Timber gas processing plant—most importantly, employee safety. Shell’s search and ultimate success in finding a solution to its arc flash challenges began with a request for a short circuit, coordination and arc flash study at the facility. The company from which they sought this assistance ended up stepping in and providing a comprehensive management solution to update Shell’s equipment to meet and exceed the safety standards.

They performed a comprehensive analysis of the facility, which showed that most of the plant was at a category 4 or higher arc flash level, as defined by the electrical safety standard NFPA 70E. The industry will generally accept up to Class 4 arc flash levels with the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). Since Shell had already developed a safety standard (barely into Class 3) based on NFPA 70E, engineers went to work to determine the best way to achieve Shell’s desired safety standards throughout the plant.

Shell’s solution was a comprehensive program to install an arc flash reduction maintenance system and retrofit conversion packages to existing equipment. The unit lowers arc flash incident energy levels by temporarily lowering trip settings during the maintenance cycle.

Service engineers began by installing an arc flash reduction maintenance system unit/conversion kit on the Burnt Timber facility’s main power distribution breaker (an existing Westinghouse DS complete with Amptector trips). This brought the 480-volt system to an acceptable arc flash safety level (category 1). The scope of the project grew when a second generator breaker (due for replacement in 2007) was also scheduled for Class 2 reconditioning (local/field repair).

During the reconditioning of the first two breakers, service field engineers also discovered that other breakers in the facility required a full Class 1 reconditioning (factory rebuild equivalent), and work is progressing on this project, too, saving Shell from potential future problems.

Due to Shell’s gas processing demands, two breakers were reconditioned on-site to a modified Class 2 level and will be elevated to Class 1 based on scheduled downtime at a later date. Two other units were shipped to the Edmonton Breaker Center where they underwent reconditioning to Class 1 levels. To date, the service engineers have completed installation of arc flash reduction maintenance system units on all six DS breakers at the facility. This solution will allow for the future safe removal of motor control center buckets without the need to power the system offline, and all the MCC buckets will be retrofitted over a two-year period.

As a result, Shell ordered 15 conversion kits with the arc flash reduction maintenance system and Class 2 reconditioning for its Scotford facility. Service engineers installed the units within a two-week period, against an extremely tight schedule. The units are easy to install on existing breakers, and as many as two to three breakers can be field-modified each day, minimizing downtime.
“Overall, the project exceeded our expectations,” said Jay Baxter, from the Shell Scotford facility. “We have committed to have 15 additional units installed to complete one section of the facility. The engineers have also recommended that similar work be performed in the remainder of the plant %%MDASSML%%which would involve 45 additional units. These changes mean we’ll have a safer work environment for our employees. And, we couldn’t have done it without Eaton’s arc flash expertise.”

For more information about PowerChain management solutions from Eaton , click here.





No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
BIM coordination; MEP projects; NFPA 13; Data center Q&A; Networked lighting controls; 2017 Product of the Year finalists
Emergency lighting; NFPA 3 and 4; Integrated building systems; Smart lighting, HVAC design
Designing for energy efficiency; Understanding and applying NFPA 101 for mission critical facilities; Integrating commissioning and testing for fire alarm systems; Optimizing unitary pumping solutions
Tying a microgrid to the smart grid; Paralleling generator systems; Previewing NEC 2017 changes
Driving motor efficiency; Preventing Arc Flash in mission critical facilities; Integrating alternative power and existing electrical systems
Putting COPS into context; Designing medium-voltage electrical systems; Planning and designing resilient, efficient data centers; The nine steps of designing generator fuel systems
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.
Automation Engineer; Wood Group
System Integrator; Cross Integrated Systems Group
Fire & Life Safety Engineer; Technip USA Inc.
click me