Project profile: Chiller retrofit at office building

A prepackaged chiller retrofit cuts energy costs by 30%, reduces required maintenance, and extends operating life at Duke Realty Corp.’s 19-story office building in Clayton, Mo.

08/26/2015


Project name: Duke Realty Corp.
Project type: Existing building retrofit
Engineering firm: Air Masters Inc. of Fenton, Mo.
Building type: Office building
Location: Clayton, Mo.
Timeline: April 2013–June 2013


Figure 1: The general system differences in chiller efficiency between a constant-speed chiller and a VFD-operated chiller. All graphics courtesy: Yaskawa America Inc.Project background

The Duke Realty Corp. building uses three 360-ton chillers to provide cooling for its  19-story office building. In the spring of 2013, Air Masters Inc. of St. Louis and Yaskawa America Inc. provided chiller optimization packages (COP) to Duke Realty Corp. The reason for these COP-retrofit installations is that chillers typically represent the single largest consumer of power in buildings, therefore, they are a logical place to consider for reducing energy consumption/costs.

A chiller will use excess energy when its compressor operates at full-rated constant speed and demand does not require full cooling capacity. This is a wasteful and unnecessary operating condition, as most chillers operate at partial load or off-peak load 99% of the time. The compressor motor in a chiller is quite large in kilowatt capacity. Typically, the motors are in the approximate range of 150 to 600 hp. Money saved by operating the compressor motor more efficiently can add up quickly.

Project challenge

Three 360-ton chillers were operating at full speed, and wasting energy with the use of variable-discharge vane throttling. The challenge was to improve both the efficiency and the operational lifecycle of the facility’s chillers.

Solutions

The best way to improve chiller compressor motor efficiency is by upgrading motor control from constant to variable speed using a variable frequency drive (VFD) and chiller control automation. Rising energy costs and electric utility rebates for VFD upgrades coupled with falling prices for large-horsepower VFDs have reduced payback times to as little as 1 yr. 
Figure 2: System PC chiller control and monitoring. Courtesy: Yaskawa America Inc.However, the chiller compressor motor VFD retrofits require some complexity in actual chiller control and condenser water temperature optimization. This may cause some owners/operators to postpone retrofits and forego savings. Details below provide clarity related to the opportunity cost of not retrofitting a chiller with a COP. Actual performance of the COP can be measured against a baseline of typical operating conditions.

 

Figure 1 illustrates the general system differences in chiller efficiency between a constant-speed chiller and a VFD-operated chiller. The Duke Realty Corp. building uses three 360-ton Trane Centravac chillers to provide cooling for its 19-story office building. Before the retrofit of the COP, the three chillers ran at constant speed. 

Figure 3: HMI of the chiller optimization packages’ controller. Courtesy: Yaskawa America Inc.

They incorporated only mechanically actuated inlet guide vanes to modulate the chiller capacity and nominally reduce energy-consumption performance. 

Condenser water control also impacts chiller efficiency. The condenser water temperature control is now set to a minimum of 65 F, at 7 F wet bulb.

All three of the chillers were designed to operate at constant speed and relied on inlet guide vanes to modulate the capacity of the chillers. The vanes improved the partial loading efficiency of chillers. VFDs were installed on two of the three chillers. The third chiller was kept for peak-demand operation.

Figure 2 is a screenshot image of the system PC chiller control and monitoring. Figure 3 is the HMI of the chiller optimization packages’ controller.

The condenser water reset temperature control further reduces the lift of the chiller, thereby favorably impacting chiller operation and efficiency.

Table 1: The annual savings is the difference between the annual consumption of the baseline and as-built model. Courtesy: Yaskawa America Inc.

Project results

An independent energy-management firm inspected the facility and used an eQuest (version 3-64) simulation model to collect data. This study was completed by the St. Louis-based energy utility.

Table 3: The measured results of the calibration effort. Courtesy: Yaskawa America Inc.The simulation was first built using as-built parameters, which included two of the three chillers being equipped with VFDs and condenser water reset controls. The model was then calibrated using billing data and 2014 weather data for the St. Louis area.

Actual chiller operation information was taken from the facility’s energy-management system.

Figure 4: The COP retrofit controls the voltage and frequency of the electrical power consumed by the compressor motor. The magnum continually optimizes chiller speed to realize 30% energy savings annually. Courtesy: Yaskawa America Inc.

The data included chiller tonnage, kilowatt demand, and condenser/chilled water temperatures. 

Using the provided data in conjunction with corresponding local weather averages, a regression was developed allowing for the determination of chiller run-time hours.

The two COP-retrofitted chillers should operate approximately 5,815 and 1,725 hr/year. The model resulted in annual run-time hours of 5,695 and 1,721 hr. The model was very close to the actual run time.

The below model was created by removing the condenser water reset control and removing the VFDs from the two chillers. The annual savings is the difference between the annual consumption of the baseline and as-built model, which can be seen in Table 1.

Verified gross savings/realization rates

The model defined the outside air temperature (OAT) and compared the constant speed (CS) with variable speed drive (VSD) operations.

The measured results of the calibration effort are shown in Table 3.

As the study indicates, a much more efficient way to adjust to changing load characteristics or lower condenser water temperatures is to vary the speed of the chiller’s impeller. The COP retrofit accomplishes this by controlling the voltage and frequency of the electrical power consumed by the compressor motor. The magnum continually optimizes chiller speed to realize the energy savings of 30% annually.



No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
Combined heat and power; Assessing replacement of electrical systems; Energy codes and lighting; Salary Survey; Fan efficiency
Commissioning lighting control systems; 2016 Commissioning Giants; Design high-efficiency hot water systems for hospitals; Evaluating condensation and condensate
Solving HVAC challenges; Thermal comfort criteria; Liquid-immersion cooling; Specifying VRF systems; 2016 Product of the Year winners
Driving motor efficiency; Preventing Arc Flash in mission critical facilities; Integrating alternative power and existing electrical systems
Putting COPS into context; Designing medium-voltage electrical systems; Planning and designing resilient, efficient data centers; The nine steps of designing generator fuel systems
Designing generator systems; Using online commissioning tools; Selective coordination best practices
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.
click me