New Findings Contradict Common Perception of Parallel Fan Efficiency

A new study finds that despite common perception, parallel fan-powered air-terminal units, which are used to distribute cooled or heated air in commercial building cooling systems, may not be more efficient than series fans.

10/02/2007


A new study from ASHRAE,t than series fans.

When designing a cooling system, building designers can choose between either a series or parallel configuration for a building’s fan-powered, air-terminal unit. Since parallel fans run intermittently while a building is occupied, this configuration has been thought to be more efficient than series fans, which run continuously during the work day.

In the study, tests conducted by investigators at Texas A&M University’s Energy Systems Laboratory, found considerable air leakage from parallel fans’ back-draft dampers and terminal box seams, greatly reducing their efficiency. Leak rates for tested parallel fan terminals were found to be, on average, between 10% to 20%, and in some cases higher than 30%. These leaks reduced the airflow from the central air handler and caused the air to bypass the room to be conditioned, resulting in more energy needed to move more air to maintain comfort in the conditioned space.

When no leakage occurs, the parallel fan terminals are more efficient, consuming 17% less energy than series fan terminals; however, tests showed that when leaks are present, series fans appear to outperform parallel fans. When a 20% leakage rate was introduced, the series terminal unit outperformed the parallel unit and used 5.5% less energy.

“For manufacturers and building design engineers, this research provides new insights into the magnitude of air leakage in parallel fan powered terminals and its impact on system operation and overall energy consumption,” said Karim Amrane, ARI’s vice president of policy and technology. “It also serves as a useful reference in prompting changes in design practices to provide more energy efficient building.”

To read the final report, “ASHRAE 1292-RP: Comparison of the Total Energy Consumption of Series vs. Parallel Fan Powered VAV Terminal Units Phase I, Development of Models for Series and Parallel Fan Variable Air Volume Terminal Units,” click here .





No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
Combined heat and power; Assessing replacement of electrical systems; Energy codes and lighting; Salary Survey; Fan efficiency
Commissioning lighting control systems; 2016 Commissioning Giants; Design high-efficiency hot water systems for hospitals; Evaluating condensation and condensate
Solving HVAC challenges; Thermal comfort criteria; Liquid-immersion cooling; Specifying VRF systems; 2016 Product of the Year winners
Driving motor efficiency; Preventing Arc Flash in mission critical facilities; Integrating alternative power and existing electrical systems
Putting COPS into context; Designing medium-voltage electrical systems; Planning and designing resilient, efficient data centers; The nine steps of designing generator fuel systems
Designing generator systems; Using online commissioning tools; Selective coordination best practices
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.
click me