NEMA Submits Comments To FERC on Rate Incentives For Transmission Investment


The National Electrical Manufacturers Assn. submitted comments in February on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission “Notice of Proposed Rulemaking” (NOPR) on incentives for transmission investment. The association was one of about 80 entities, including utilities, state regulators, technology developers, financial institutions, and trade associations, representing many of these, that commented.

The resulting rule will implement Sections 1223, Advanced Transmission Technologies, and 1241, Transmission Infrastructure Investment, of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005). NEMA drafted both of these provisions in 2001 and shepherded them through the four-year legislative process.

In the comments, NEMA agreed that the transmission system has experienced significant underinvestment for decades, but that EPAct 2005 provides a unique opportunity to reverse the trend.

NEMA noted that while the FERC-proposed rule on mandatory transmission reliability standards addresses operational reliability of the existing system, it does not address adequate future transmission capacity. Consequently, NEMA felt capacity must be covered in the rate incentive rulemaking.

NEMA agreed with FERC that there may be administrative regulatory steps that could be taken (for example, ensuring that incentive rates, once approved, cannot be reopened for a period of time absent compelling circumstances) to reduce the reluctance of transmission companies to seek rate relief. The association also agreed that incentive-based rate measures enumerated in the NOPR should be in the rule.

NEMA agreed that the proposed incentives discussed in the NOPR, including return on equity-based incentives, will help to stimulate investment in new transmission facilities. But the association did not believe that the deployment of innovative technologies for transmission facilities will necessarily follow. If rate incentives are only applied to assure cost recovery, then there is no incentive to install advanced technology because there is no consideration of risk and reward, NEMA commented. Rate incentives must go beyond cost recovery; rates to encourage advanced technology can be a vehicle to accelerate the evolution toward the “smart grid” of the future, NEMA officials said.

No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
Emergency lighting; NFPA 3 and 4; Integrated building systems; Smart lighting, HVAC design
Designing for energy efficiency; Understanding and applying NFPA 101 for mission critical facilities; Integrating commissioning and testing for fire alarm systems; Optimizing unitary pumping solutions
Economics of HVAC systems; NFPA 110-2016; Designing and choosing modular data centers
Tying a microgrid to the smart grid; Paralleling generator systems; Previewing NEC 2017 changes
Driving motor efficiency; Preventing Arc Flash in mission critical facilities; Integrating alternative power and existing electrical systems
Putting COPS into context; Designing medium-voltage electrical systems; Planning and designing resilient, efficient data centers; The nine steps of designing generator fuel systems
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.
Automation Engineer; Wood Group
System Integrator; Cross Integrated Systems Group
Fire & Life Safety Engineer; Technip USA Inc.
click me