More Efficient Heat Recovery


With today’s ever-increasing energy costs, it is as important as ever to design HVAC systems that minimize energy use. Given the high ventilation requirements of many applications, engineers must design cost-effective heat-recovery systems.

Air-to-air heat exchanger systems require the air distribution ductwork for the two airstreams to be in close proximity. However, many times it is impractical to configure ductwork to use this approach.

Run-around hydronic loop systems allow for heat recovery from a system where the airstreams are not in close proximity. Unfortunately, the amount of heat recovered depends on the relative temperature differentials between the two airstreams, as well as on the associated water temperature differential that can be generated within the run-around loop. These limitations many times result in an unacceptable payback for these systems.

A different approach

A cost-effective alternative to these systems uses heat pipe technology. The heat pipe system is similar to the run-around hydronic loop, except that it uses refrigerant for the heat transfer media. A refrigerant coil is placed within each airstream, and the two coils are connected by refrigerant piping. The system utilizes the latent heat of evaporation and condensation to transport the energy. The refrigerant evaporates within the coil located in the hot airstream. The expansion of the refrigerant within the coil causes the refrigerant to flow out of the coil and back to the coil located in the cold airstream. The refrigerant condenses within the coil in the cold airstream, thereby giving up the heat of condensation to the cold airstream. This approach allows for two distinct advantages:

First, significantly more heat per lb. of transfer media is produced, resulting in smaller system components, less investment cost and improved economic performance. A comparison of the two systems indicates that:

1) R-22 heat pipe system transfers 84.5 BTU/lb., a water system transfers 1 BTU/lb. and a 50% glycol system transfers 0.93 BTU/lb. of media.

2) The same amount of heat is transferred with:

• 26.1 gal. per min. of R-22 using the heat pipe system.

• 275 gal. per min. of water using a traditional run-around loop system.

• 300 gal. per min. of 50% glycol using a traditional run-around loop system.

The second advantage is that the system does not require a pump to transfer the media if the exhaust and outside airstreams are relatively close.

Heat pipe technology can also be used to provide dehumidification within HVAC air-handling systems in a manner that is significantly more efficient than conventional methods.

Conventional systems dehumidify supply air by overcooling it to the point where the moisture condenses out of the airstream. The air is then reheated back up to the required supply air temperature. The heat pipe system, however, uses the heat pipe heat-recovery system to absorb heat from the supply airstream, thereby pre-cooling the air and condensing the moisture from it. The heat that is absorbed from the supply air is then used to reheat the air after the moisture is removed.

Heat pipe advantages

• Produces more heat per lb. of transfer media

• Doesn’t require a pump to transfer the media if airstreams are close to each other

• Can provide more efficient dehumidification within an HVAC system

No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
Integrating electrical and HVAC for energy efficiency; Mixed-use buildings; ASHRAE 90.4; Wireless fire alarms assessment and challenges
integrated building networks, NFPA 99, recover waste heat, chilled water systems, Internet of Things, BAS controls
40 Under 40; Performance-based design; Clean agent fire suppression; NFPA 92; Future of commissioning; Successful project management principles
Transformers; Electrical system design; Selecting and sizing transformers; Grounded and ungrounded system design, Paralleling generator systems
Commissioning electrical systems; Designing emergency and standby generator systems; VFDs in high-performance buildings
Tying a microgrid to the smart grid; Paralleling generator systems; Previewing NEC 2017 changes
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.
Automation Engineer; Wood Group
System Integrator; Cross Integrated Systems Group
Fire & Life Safety Engineer; Technip USA Inc.
This course focuses on climate analysis, appropriateness of cooling system selection, and combining cooling systems.
This course will help identify and reveal electrical hazards and identify the solutions to implementing and maintaining a safe work environment.
This course explains how maintaining power and communication systems through emergency power-generation systems is critical.
click me