Machine Safety: What do you mean the vice president said: So What?

After a two hour presentation in the conference room providing all the new high technology based machine guarding solutions and testimonials on operating cost savings, the vice president of operations said, “So what!”?

07/30/2012


After a two hour presentation in the conference room providing all the new high technology based machine guarding solutions and testimonials on operating cost savings, the vice president of operations said, “So what!”?

 

This is a reminder of the "Five Levels of Hazard Mitigation"

For review, the five levels of hazard mitigation are:

1.) Eliminate the hazard – design it out

2.) Isolate the hazard with hard guarding

3.) Add additional engineering, guards, devices, or layers of safety (controls or systems)

4.) Administrative controls like – training, signage, assessments, etc.

5.) Personal protective equipment (PPE) like - goggles, gloves, outer clothing, shields, etc.

 

In my opinion, industry most always wants to see a comprehensive solutions approach to their machine guarding issues. Over the past 40 years I’ve seen lots of machine guarding situations and most of them involved at least two or three of the above levels for mitigation. And, only a hand full of companies made corporate wide decisions to treat any and all identified machine guarding hazards with Cat 3 level solutions. With this said, what it means to one is not what it means to another.

 

This is why it’s so very important to think ahead about the “so what” question and address it up front.

 

How important do you think listening skills are? This is to say that different companies have different cultures. It’s been my experience that these cultures play a significant role in how different companies define their “acceptable” level of hazard mitigation. Understanding these dimensions provides an opportunity to evaluate the “Five Levels of Hazard Mitigation” and how they may be important to any one application and company. In my opinion, a solutions based resource needs to be proficient in all five levels to address the “so what” question. Otherwise, you risk presenting the gold-plated solution to a “crawl, walk, run” based company. A great balance sheet doesn’t guarantee that their ready to drive a Bentley.    

Your comments or suggestion are always welcome so please let us know your thoughts. Submit your ideas, experiences, and challenges on this subject in the comments section below. Click on the following text if you don't see a comments box, then scroll down: Machine Safety: What do you mean the vice president said: So What?

 

J.B. Titus, CFSERelated articles:

Machine Safety – is OSHA okay with my “acceptable” risk mitigation?

Safe or Safe Enough by John M. Piampiano and Steven M. Rizzo, Professional Safety, Jan., 2012

Machine Guarding & The Hierarchy of Measures for Hazard Mitigation

Machine Safety – how safe is safe enough?

Contact: www.jbtitus.com for “Solutions for Machine Safety”.



No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
High-performance buildings; Building envelope and integration; Electrical, HVAC system integration; Smoke control systems; Using BAS for M&V
Pressure piping systems: Designing with ASME; Lab ventilation; Lighting controls; Reduce energy use with VFDs
Smoke control: Designing for proper ventilation; Smart Grid Standard 201P; Commissioning HVAC systems; Boilers and boiler systems
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Consulting-Specifying Engineer case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Protecting standby generators for mission critical facilities; Selecting energy-efficient transformers; Integrating power monitoring systems; Mitigating harmonics in electrical systems
Commissioning electrical systems in mission critical facilities; Anticipating the Smart Grid; Mitigating arc flash hazards in medium-voltage switchgear; Comparing generator sizing software
Integrating BAS, electrical systems; Electrical system flexibility; Hospital electrical distribution; Electrical system grounding
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.