Machine Safety: What do you mean the vice president said: So What?

After a two hour presentation in the conference room providing all the new high technology based machine guarding solutions and testimonials on operating cost savings, the vice president of operations said, “So what!”?

07/30/2012


After a two hour presentation in the conference room providing all the new high technology based machine guarding solutions and testimonials on operating cost savings, the vice president of operations said, “So what!”?

 

This is a reminder of the "Five Levels of Hazard Mitigation"

For review, the five levels of hazard mitigation are:

1.) Eliminate the hazard – design it out

2.) Isolate the hazard with hard guarding

3.) Add additional engineering, guards, devices, or layers of safety (controls or systems)

4.) Administrative controls like – training, signage, assessments, etc.

5.) Personal protective equipment (PPE) like - goggles, gloves, outer clothing, shields, etc.

 

In my opinion, industry most always wants to see a comprehensive solutions approach to their machine guarding issues. Over the past 40 years I’ve seen lots of machine guarding situations and most of them involved at least two or three of the above levels for mitigation. And, only a hand full of companies made corporate wide decisions to treat any and all identified machine guarding hazards with Cat 3 level solutions. With this said, what it means to one is not what it means to another.

 

This is why it’s so very important to think ahead about the “so what” question and address it up front.

 

How important do you think listening skills are? This is to say that different companies have different cultures. It’s been my experience that these cultures play a significant role in how different companies define their “acceptable” level of hazard mitigation. Understanding these dimensions provides an opportunity to evaluate the “Five Levels of Hazard Mitigation” and how they may be important to any one application and company. In my opinion, a solutions based resource needs to be proficient in all five levels to address the “so what” question. Otherwise, you risk presenting the gold-plated solution to a “crawl, walk, run” based company. A great balance sheet doesn’t guarantee that their ready to drive a Bentley.    

Your comments or suggestion are always welcome so please let us know your thoughts. Submit your ideas, experiences, and challenges on this subject in the comments section below. Click on the following text if you don't see a comments box, then scroll down: Machine Safety: What do you mean the vice president said: So What?

 

J.B. Titus, CFSERelated articles:

Machine Safety – is OSHA okay with my “acceptable” risk mitigation?

Safe or Safe Enough by John M. Piampiano and Steven M. Rizzo, Professional Safety, Jan., 2012

Machine Guarding & The Hierarchy of Measures for Hazard Mitigation

Machine Safety – how safe is safe enough?

Contact: www.jbtitus.com for “Solutions for Machine Safety”.



No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
integrated building networks, NFPA 99, recover waste heat, chilled water systems, Internet of Things, BAS controls
40 Under 40; Performance-based design; Clean agent fire suppression; NFPA 92; Future of commissioning; Successful project management principles
BIM coordination; MEP projects; NFPA 13; Data center Q&A; Networked lighting controls; 2017 Product of the Year finalists
Transformers; Electrical system design; Selecting and sizing transformers; Grounded and ungrounded system design, Paralleling generator systems
Commissioning electrical systems; Designing emergency and standby generator systems; VFDs in high-performance buildings
Tying a microgrid to the smart grid; Paralleling generator systems; Previewing NEC 2017 changes
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.
Automation Engineer; Wood Group
System Integrator; Cross Integrated Systems Group
Fire & Life Safety Engineer; Technip USA Inc.
This course focuses on climate analysis, appropriateness of cooling system selection, and combining cooling systems.
This course will help identify and reveal electrical hazards and identify the solutions to implementing and maintaining a safe work environment.
This course explains how maintaining power and communication systems through emergency power-generation systems is critical.
click me