Looking at electric drive efficiency

variable-frequency drives (VFDs) provide dramatic energy savings in myriad applications with varying loads and speeds. While power and energy savings are key benefits, VFD efficiency is also of interest because drives can experience significant efficiency losses at partial load operation-much like electric motors.

07/01/2009


Five makes of VFDs tested had efficiency variations (bands) as shown for 50 hp (37 kW) units running at different speeds - along with larger characteristic efficiency drop-off at reduced torque and speed.

Few will dispute that variable-frequency drives (VFDs) provide dramatic energy savings in myriad applications with varying loads and speeds. While power and energy savings are key benefits, VFD efficiency is also of interest because drives can experience significant efficiency losses at partial load operation—much like electric motors. Yet motors have received predominant attention for energy efficiency, including development of recognized test procedures and standards. A broader look at “motor system” efficiency must recognize the effect of VFDs.

Recent progress in this area includes work done at the energy technology labs of Hydro-Quebec's (Canada) Research Institute. Findings of the underlying study, “Variable Frequency Drive Testing,” have been presented at Motor Summit 2008 (Zurich, Switzerland), MEPSA 2009 (Sydney, Australia), and 2009 Motor, Drive & Automation Systems Conference (Orlando, FL) by Pierre Angers, an engineer at Hydro-Quebec.

“Published VFD efficiencies at other than full rated power are scarce,” says Angers. “There is no recognized VFD efficiency standard for comparing different makes of drives.” Efficiency is the highest around 100% speed, which is just where you don't want to use variable-speed drives, hence most available efficiency values are virtually “useless,” Angers explains.

Goals of the project were to establish an efficiency testing procedure for VFDs, motors, and VFD-motor combinations—as well as to enable efficiency comparison between various VFD systems. Angers has tested five major makes of VFDs, which powered three sizes of induction motors (10, 50, and 100 hp/7.5, 37, 75 kW) at various loads and speeds. For each test run a series of 20 test points ranged widely over “% speed” and “% nominal torque” values (25-100% speed and 10-100% torque). Drive manufacturers' names remain proprietary. Test setup measured efficiency as a ratio of output to input power.

Preliminary results show 2-8% variation in VFD system efficiency, especially at low loads and speeds. Efficiency variation between different brands of VFDs was substantially less (see diagram). However, variability of VFD efficiency is further impacted by factors such as drive temperature, supply voltage (and voltage unbalance), switching frequency, and drive options like active front-end, reactors, or output filters.

One novel aspect of Angers' research is presentation of motor system efficiency results as a contour map, with percent nominal speed and percent torque serving as other variables. A typical conveyor application plots as a horizontal line (constant torque) across the efficiency contours, while a pump/fan application plots as a cubic system curve.

The work described here is the basis of a protocol for testing VFD efficiency. Two proposed standards are in draft status: Canadian standard (CSA C838) Variable Frequency Drives and International Electrotechnical Commission standard IEC 60034-2-3.

Users of VFDs obtain energy savings from matching motor speed to load requirements; in addition, they need to be able to compare efficiency of different electric drive brands for their applications.


Author Information

Frank J. Bartos, P.E., is a Control Engineering consulting editor. Reach him at braunbart@sbcglobal.net .




No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
Water use efficiency: Diminishing water quality, escalating costs; Lowering building energy use; Power for fire pumps
Building envelope and integration; Manufacturing industrial Q&A; NFPA 99; Testing fire systems
Labs and research facilities: Q&A with the experts; Water heating systems; Smart building integration; 40 Under 40 winners
Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Protecting standby generators for mission critical facilities; Selecting energy-efficient transformers; Integrating power monitoring systems; Mitigating harmonics in electrical systems
Commissioning electrical systems in mission critical facilities; Anticipating the Smart Grid; Mitigating arc flash hazards in medium-voltage switchgear; Comparing generator sizing software
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.