Gas-fueled CHP delivers heat, CO2 for greenhouses

Combined heat and power systems can be efficient and effective in greenhouses.


Learning Objectives

  1. Learn how combined heat and power (CHP) can benefit greenhouse efficiency.
  2. Understand the treatment of exhaust gases.
  3. Learn how to effectively select, design, and install CHP systems in greenhouses.

Figure 1: This shows a comparison of the efficiency of traditional power station electricity and boiler heating systems with a combined heat and power system. All graphics courtesy: Cummins Power GenerationCommercial greenhouses today are sophisticated operations, growing plants more efficiently than in previous generations with new technologies that make better use of light and air. Key ingredients in this natural resource mix are heat and carbon dioxide, both of which are produced alongside electricity by a generator set. It is no surprise that cogeneration solutions are increasingly popular in greenhouses, and gas-fueled generator sets in particular are proving their all-around viability.

The electricity and heat that we use are traditionally generated by two separate processes in two separate places—electricity in a power station and heat in a boiler. However, this “separated production,” as it is known, loses approximately half the energy input of the power station to the atmosphere in the form of heat. This energy waste is far from ideal, and steps should be taken to avoid it wherever possible.

At locations where electricity and heat are required at the same time, it is always preferable to explore the options for cogeneration, also called combined heat and power (CHP). When heat can be used directly at the location where electricity is produced, the heat does not go to waste.

The principle of CHP is simple: a diesel or gas-fueled engine drives an electrical generator, producing the required electrical power. Meanwhile heat is recovered from four sources: the engine’s jacket cooling, the lube oil, the intercooler and the exhaust gas. In total, cogeneration can typically recover 95% of the produced heat in total, and this heat is transferred to the network of heating pipes through heat exchangers.

In addition to making use of recovered heat, well-designed and implemented cogeneration is also good for the environment, since it consumes less fuel and releases lower levels of emissions into the atmosphere, especially if highly efficient lean-burn gas engines are used. The fuel savings are dramatic.

For the same production of electricity and heat, 30% of fuel can be saved with cogeneration compared to conventional separated production of heat and power, as shown in Figure 1.

Gas-driven CHP and CO2 production in greenhouses

Green plants fuel their growth by absorbing carbon dioxide from the air and water from the ground, which they synthesize into complex hydrocarbon molecules such as glucose. Energy from sunlight energizes the synthesis. Commercial greenhouses frequently deploy additional illumination from scientifically chosen angles, and use LEDs to supplement natural light with a tailored light-spectrum that promotes plant growth. The synthesis of hydrocarbons is known as photosynthesis, and the basic equation of this photochemical reaction is as follows:

6CO2 + 6H2 O → C6 H12O6 + 6O2

sunlight glucose oxygen

Extra CO2 to augment the level inside the greenhouse can be sourced in a number of ways, including exhaust gases from heating and, less frequently, the administration of pure CO2 purchased commercially.

However, CHP makes it possible for the required CO2 to be obtained from the exhaust gases of a gas-fueled engine. This becomes viable once certain components of the gases have been reduced to below the level that would be harmful to the plants. The gas components to be reduced are specifically nonmethane hydrocarbons (NMHC) and nitrogen oxides (NOx).

Treatment of the exhaust gases is achieved by selective catalytic reduction (SCR) using the widely available chemical urea as a reductant to produce CO2 in a three-step process.

First, an exact amount of urea proportional to the NOx level is injected into the hot exhaust gases. The urea is transformed into ammonia (NH3) by a process called pyrolysis. In this catalytic part of the process, the nitrogen oxides react with the urea forming nitrogen and water.

NOx + NH3 → N2 + nH2O

Second, a part of the NMHC is transformed into carbon monoxide (CO).

Finally, the CO and the NMHC are transformed into CO2.

The equipment to treat the exhaust gases is mounted where the exhaust gases are hottest. Before entering the greenhouse, a condenser is used to cool the cleaned gases below 122 F.

Plants require most CO2 when conditions are optimal for photosynthesis—in other words when there is sunlight—and at these times the plants have minimal need for heat. Since a generator set produces heat and CO2 at the same time, heat produced by the generator set throughout the day is normally stored in a buffer tank for use during the night.

Figure 2: Shown is CO2 production with a combined heat and power system versus a traditional gas burner. CO2 production with CHP versus traditional gas burner

Greenhouses have traditionally used gas burners to convert the input energy into heat. When a CHP unit burns gas, however, approximately 40% of the input energy is converted into electricity. Consequently, to produce the same amount of output heat from the same input energy, a CHP unit burns more gas, and produces approximately twice the amount of CO2.

There are two ways of exploiting this difference. The greenhouse can run on a higher concentration of CO2, stimulating plant growth and yielding a higher efficiency per square foot of surface. Alternately, the CHP can produce the same quantity of CO2 as a gas burner would, but only half the quantity of heat. Which method is used depends on many factors such as the type of plants, the time of the year, the surface area of the greenhouse, and the capacity of the heat storage tank.

CHP for heat and CO2 production for greenhouse applications can pay back in a remarkably short time, ranging anywhere from 1.5 to 3 years in favorable conditions. Gas-fueled generator sets are highly suitable for this application because of their excellent environmental characteristics and their efficient production of heat and electricity.

When implementing a solution, the designer must consider a number of points. For the dimensioning of the CO2 equipment such as tubes and fans, for example, it is important to keep in mind the excess air factor, defined as the amount of air admitted divided by the minimum amount of air required for the complete combustion of a fuel. The amount of air for complete combustion of a fuel depends on the composition of the fuel.

Combustion of approximately 35 cubic ft of natural gas at normal temperature and pressure (1 N m³) needs approximately 8.5 N m³ of air. Lean-burn engines operate at a high excess air factor (above 1.5) to keep NOx production to a minimum. Consequently, a CHP unit produces a larger volume of exhaust gases than a burner.

From the point of view of pressure loss, it is very important that components to be installed in the exhaust gas system, such as SCR, heat exchanger, condenser, and silencers, are selected precisely. Too much pressure loss in the exhaust system causes a bad working engine.

Design and installation of the CHP unit must take these and other factors into account. With the right design of the CHP unit, this application of cogeneration has been shown to be commercially viable. Greenhouses around the world are now recognizing the benefits, and adding CHP to the other technologies that help them promote plant growth and operate more profitability.

Stefan De Wit became a project manager at Cummins Power Generation in 1997 and is responsible for cogeneration and trigeneration units for industrial, landfill, biogas, and greenhouse applications. 

No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
BIM coordination; MEP projects; NFPA 13; Data center Q&A; Networked lighting controls; 2017 Product of the Year finalists
Emergency lighting; NFPA 3 and 4; Integrated building systems; Smart lighting, HVAC design
Designing for energy efficiency; Understanding and applying NFPA 101 for mission critical facilities; Integrating commissioning and testing for fire alarm systems; Optimizing unitary pumping solutions
Tying a microgrid to the smart grid; Paralleling generator systems; Previewing NEC 2017 changes
Driving motor efficiency; Preventing Arc Flash in mission critical facilities; Integrating alternative power and existing electrical systems
Putting COPS into context; Designing medium-voltage electrical systems; Planning and designing resilient, efficient data centers; The nine steps of designing generator fuel systems
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.
Automation Engineer; Wood Group
System Integrator; Cross Integrated Systems Group
Fire & Life Safety Engineer; Technip USA Inc.
click me