Electrical, power report: Differences between small, medium, large companies

In April 2014, Consulting-Specifying Engineer surveyed its audience members responsible for decisions related to the design of electrical or power systems within their organizations. Of the respondents, 53% are employed at a firm with less than 100 people on staff, 19% have 100 to 499 employees, and 28% have 500 or more. How does your firm compare to those of similar size?

08/28/2014


150Less than 100 employees

  • The average annual mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection (MEP/FP) revenue for firms with less than 100 employees was about $2.6 million, 88% of which is generated from projects in which electrical or power systems were specified.

  • The top three building structures in which products are specified, designed, or selected are office buildings (71.7%), industrial/manufacturing facilities/warehouses (61.9%), and educational facilities (57.2%).

  • The top three electrical or power systems or equipment being specified by smaller firms are electrical distribution (82.7%); circuit breakers, fuses, etc. (82.1%); and cable, wire, etc. (80.9%).

  • A short period in which a project needs to be completed was cited as a top challenge in electrical or power systems and design for these firms.

  • More than 9 out of 10 respondents employed at a small firm agreed that product quality (99.4%), the manufacturer’s reputation (93.0%), and interoperability (91.3%) are very important factors they consider when specifying electrical or power systems.

100 to 499 employees

  • The average annual mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection (MEP/FP) revenue for firms with 100 to 499 employees was about $8.7 million, 40% of which is generated from projects in which electrical or power systems were specified.

  • The top three building structures in which products are specified, designed, or selected are industrial/manufacturing facilities/warehouses (63.5%), office buildings (61.9%) and educational facilities (55.6%).

  • The top three electrical or power systems or equipment being specified by medium-sized firms are electrical distribution (96.8%); cable, wire, etc. (93.7%); and transformers (92.1%).

  • Designing with energy efficiency as a priority was cited as a top challenge in electrical or power systems and design for these firms.

  • More than 90% respondents employed at a medium-sized firm agreed that product quality (100%), interoperability (95.3%), energy efficiency of product (95.2%), service support (95.2%), manufacturer’s reputation (93.6%), technical advantage of product (92.1%), warranty (92.1%), and initial product cost (90.4%) are very important factors they consider when specifying electrical or power systems.

500 employees or more

  • The average annual mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection (MEP/FP) revenue for firms with 500 employees or more was about $12.2 million, 33% of which is generated from projects in which electrical or power systems were specified.

  • The top three building structures in which products are specified, designed, or selected are industrial/manufacturing facilities/warehouses (58.1%), office buildings (48.4%), and utilities/public works/transportation (47.3%).

  • The top three electrical or power systems or equipment being specified by large firms are circuit breakers, fuses, etc. (88.2%); electrical distribution (88.2%); and transformers (78.5%).

  • Providing a high quality design with an inadequate budget was cited as a top challenge in electrical or power systems and design for these firms.

  • The majority of respondents employed at a large firm agreed that product quality (100%), previous experience with manufacturer (94.7%), service support (94.7%) technical advantage of product (93.6%), interoperability (91.4%), lifecycle cost (91.4%), manufacturer’s reputation (90.3%), and warranty (90.3%) are very important factors they consider when specifying electrical or power systems.


More research

On a quarterly basis, Consulting-Specifying Engineer surveys its audience based on four main topics: fire and life safety, electrical and power, lighting and lighting controls, and HVAC and building automation systems. All of the reports are available online, free for a limited time, at www.csemag.com/research



No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
Combined heat and power; Assessing replacement of electrical systems; Energy codes and lighting; Salary Survey; Fan efficiency
Commissioning lighting control systems; 2016 Commissioning Giants; Design high-efficiency hot water systems for hospitals; Evaluating condensation and condensate
Solving HVAC challenges; Thermal comfort criteria; Liquid-immersion cooling; Specifying VRF systems; 2016 Product of the Year winners
Driving motor efficiency; Preventing Arc Flash in mission critical facilities; Integrating alternative power and existing electrical systems
Putting COPS into context; Designing medium-voltage electrical systems; Planning and designing resilient, efficient data centers; The nine steps of designing generator fuel systems
Designing generator systems; Using online commissioning tools; Selective coordination best practices
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.
click me