Designing for better indoor air quality

Indoor air quality needs to be a higher priority during the design process of living and working spaces because it is vital to occupant health and well-being.

04/03/2017


Indoor air quality needs to be a higher priority during the design process of living and working spaces because it is vital to occupant health and well-being. Courtesy: ArupPeople around the world spend increasing amounts of time in air-tight environments—buildings where a focus on energy efficiency often emphasize the value of centrally controlled conditions over indoor air quality. We need to make indoor air quality a higher priority during the design process if we’re to successfully support occupants’ health and well-being.

Studies by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency have found that indoor air pollution can potentially be significantly worse than outdoor. Given that people spend up to 90% of their time indoors, the quality and effects of indoor air needs more attention. Indeed, public health awareness of indoor air quality lags well behind existing concerns about city smog and vehicles’ production of carbon monoxide and other pollutants.

Even with well-designed ventilation systems, poor understanding by occupants of how they work can often lead to ineffective ventilation. In addition, a lack of understanding of the sources of harmful contaminants prevents occupants from avoiding high-emission products.

Poor indoor air quality can severely impact an occupant’s health and well-being, causing drowsiness, headaches, and skin irritation through to chronic respiratory problems and cancer. It can also negatively affect occupant productivity and a building’s operational performance.

Limiting the sources of contaminants within a property is key. A large proportion of harmful emissions encountered within buildings can be attributed to materials—both construction materials as well as those introduced by occupant activities, e.g., cleaning products, perfumes, etc. By substituting them with lower-emission products, these sources can be reduced or removed, leading to significant improvements in the quality of indoor air. And these improvements can often be achieved without additional cost.

The issue also takes different forms depending on where in the world people live and work. More than 3 billion people still cook and heat their homes using open fires and leaky stoves. Improvements to the type of fuels used and level of ventilation are key. A recent study in Delhi, India, found that 34% of people who spend a lot of time in offices and homes may suffer from respiratory diseases, and more than 82% of offices in the country’s capital have unhealthy air quality.

Legislation relating to indoor air quality varies globally. For example, in the UK there is no legislation relating to emissions from products inside buildings, such as flooring products and adhesives, which will often emit volatile organic compounds. Regulations could be increased or tightened, but it will still take an increased public awareness about indoor air quality issues before this will gain traction. We can’t afford to wait, and so I advocate for owners and occupiers to take their own action, for example, by selecting low-emitting construction and furnishing materials.

Emily Walport is graduate engineer at Arup. She has worked on a wide variety of projects, from atmospheric corrosion studies to research into additive manufacturing, and has been involved in developing Arup’s healthy materials capabilities.

Nonlegislative guidance on how to improve indoor air quality does exist. Take, for example, ASHRAE’s Air Quality Guide. And air quality inside buildings is also increasingly part of wider building standards like LEED, BREEAM, and WELL.

For the design and architecture community, it’s vital that there is increased attention paid to this aspect of design if we are to improve the level of health and well-being created within buildings.


Emily Walport is graduate engineer at Arup. She has worked on a wide variety of projects, from atmospheric corrosion studies to research into additive manufacturing, and has been involved in developing Arup’s healthy materials capabilities. This article was originally published on Arup Thoughts. Arup is a CFE Media content partner.



No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
BIM coordination; MEP projects; NFPA 13; Data center Q&A; Networked lighting controls; 2017 Product of the Year finalists
Emergency lighting; NFPA 3 and 4; Integrated building systems; Smart lighting, HVAC design
Designing for energy efficiency; Understanding and applying NFPA 101 for mission critical facilities; Integrating commissioning and testing for fire alarm systems; Optimizing unitary pumping solutions
Tying a microgrid to the smart grid; Paralleling generator systems; Previewing NEC 2017 changes
Driving motor efficiency; Preventing Arc Flash in mission critical facilities; Integrating alternative power and existing electrical systems
Putting COPS into context; Designing medium-voltage electrical systems; Planning and designing resilient, efficient data centers; The nine steps of designing generator fuel systems
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.
Automation Engineer; Wood Group
System Integrator; Cross Integrated Systems Group
Fire & Life Safety Engineer; Technip USA Inc.
click me