Demand what you’re worth

To gain more respect, demand what you want—or even say no.

03/24/2014


In a Consulting-Specifying Engineer article in April 2011 entitled “Successful engineering in the 21st century,” I posited that for an engineer to be successful in the 21st century, he or she needed to develop skills around three things:

  1. Vision and the world
  2. Situational leadership, strategy, and systems thinking
  3. Organizational leadership.

Now, I would like to put forth the proposition that the engineering profession and engineers suffer from a lack of self-esteem and a lack of fortitude to demand what we are worth.

Throughout my career and my involvement in many professional organizations, I have continually heard engineers bemoan the fact that they feel we don’t get the respect or remuneration we deserve. They point to myriad examples of how engineers have made the world better and are not recognized for that work.

About a decade ago, I was telling a fellow engineer that I served on the board of an insurance company. He asked what I was paid for that work, and I said it worked out to be about $1,000 per hour. His response was, "You are not worth that much." To which I responded, "Yes, I am. Someone is paying me that, so they must think I am worth it, and the real problem is that you don’t think you are worth it."

I once attended a conference where the keynote speaker noted that engineers are more responsible for extending life expectancy than the medical profession. There was a palpable sense of disbelief in the audience. The engineers were asking themselves, “How could that be? We don’t do things like that.”

The speaker then noted that the two biggest reasons that life expectancy had been extended were clean water and better sanitation—just look at sanitation in the Third World and life expectancy there. You could see the entire audience smile in unison. They realized that their profession had been responsible for something that had brought real, tangible life benefits to people.

I personally have served on the boards of large publicly traded companies, one an insurance company and the other a utility. If we polled engineers in private practice, I bet less than 10% would answer yes when asked if they were qualified for board positions. While I did not actively search for board positions, I made myself available for them. And over the years I built my skill set, my belief in myself, and my network so I would be ready for the positions when they presented themselves.

There is an old saying, "If you don't ask, you don't get." And my grandfather (an engineer) said that the most profitable word in the English language often is “no.”

Too often I have heard engineers say, "We had no other choice than to take the fee and terms offered." Sure you had a choice—you could have said no. I realize that it is difficult to say no; it might hurt your business, force you to let staff go, and require you to take other unpleasant actions. But by saying yes, you are often throwing good money after bad.

If you stand up and say no, you just might garner the client’s respect

Over the years, many clients have asked me why I should change the fee or terms when I have firms that will agree to them. If engineers and the engineering profession want to gain more respect and a more prominent place in our society, they need to believe in themselves and demand the position.


John F. Hennessy III is a principal in the firm of Hennessy Energy, an energy conservation and project performance-consulting firm. He is the former chairman of the board and CEO of the Syska Hennessy Group.



No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
Water use efficiency: Diminishing water quality, escalating costs; Lowering building energy use; Power for fire pumps
Building envelope and integration; Manufacturing industrial Q&A; NFPA 99; Testing fire systems
Labs and research facilities: Q&A with the experts; Water heating systems; Smart building integration; 40 Under 40 winners
Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Protecting standby generators for mission critical facilities; Selecting energy-efficient transformers; Integrating power monitoring systems; Mitigating harmonics in electrical systems
Commissioning electrical systems in mission critical facilities; Anticipating the Smart Grid; Mitigating arc flash hazards in medium-voltage switchgear; Comparing generator sizing software
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.