Criteria for selecting arc flash protection techniques, Part 3


Arc flash mitigating relay

Figure 4: An arc flash mitigating relay application uses a combination of overcurrent detection and light intensity detection inside of a switchgear compartment. Courtesy: Schneider ElectricTable 3: There are numerous benefits associated with arc flash mitigating relay as well as some disadvantages. Courtesy: Schneider ElectricThere are now relays and relay protection functions designed specifically for the detection of arc flash events. They use new detection techniques and algorithms. The most common detection technique is a combination of overcurrent detection and light intensity detection inside of a switchgear compartment. The light detection is done with either point light sensors mounted in different switchgear compartments or with a fiber optic loop running through several compartments or along the bus. When the relay detects both an overcurrent situation and a fast, substantial increase in light intensity, it concludes that an arc flash event is occurring. The relay will then signal for an upstream breaker to trip. This process greatly reduces the time it takes to both detect an arc flash event and signal a trip to upstream breakers when compared with traditional circuit protection methods. Traditional systems can require 100 to 400 msec to detect the arc flash, signal the breaker to trip, and open the breaker. Arc mitigating relays can reduce this time to 52 to 57 msec. This can greatly reduce the amount of damaging energy because arc flash incident energy is linearly proportional to the duration of the arc flash.

These relays can be used in both medium- and low-voltage applications, but like bus differential protection, they can be more costly in low-voltage applications compared to the base cost. In medium-voltage applications the cost increase is small compared to other arc flash protection methods.

Active high-speed switch

Figure 5: Active high-speed switch arc flash protection applications do not rely on an upstream circuit breaker to extinguish the arc. Courtesy: Schneider ElectricTable 4: There are numerous benefits associated with active high-speed shorting switch arc flash protection as well as some disadvantages. Courtesy: Schneider ElectricAn active high-speed switch solution takes the arc flash mitigating relay a step further. It relies on the arc flash detection from relays as mentioned before (using the overcurrent plus light detection technique), but also incorporates a fast-acting switch that redirects the energy from the wayward path through ionized air to a lower resistance metal conductive path. This effectively extinguishes the arc. The system simultaneously signals for an upstream breaker to open to interrupt the fault. This method has often been referred to as a “high-speed shorting switch.”

The biggest advantage of this method is that it does not rely on an upstream circuit breaker to extinguish the arc. Fast-acting switch systems have been developed that can detect and extinguish the arc in less than 4 msec. High-speed switch solutions are designed to protect both personnel and equipment. Of all the protection methods available, active high-speed switches offer the highest reduction in arc flash incident energy and the shortest recovery time.

A variety of methods are available for implementation into switchgear for increasing protection against arc flash incident energy. Many criteria must be considered in choosing which methods to use, including application, cost, targets of protection (personnel and equipment), standards, and recovery time. In some cases multiple methods can be the best choice for reducing incident energy to protect equipment.

Table 5: The following outlines various arc flash protection methods and how they meet specific selection criteria. Courtesy: Schneider Electric

Ken Joye is staff marketing specialist at Schneider Electric. He has worked for Schneider Electric for 39 years, specializing in medium-voltage equipment applications for more than 20 years. Joe Richard is senior marketing specialist at Schneider Electric. He graduated with a BSEE from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 2007. He has worked for Schneider Electric for 6 years, specializing in medium-voltage switchgear and applications.

<< First < Previous 1 2 Next > Last >>


Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
Salary survey: How much are you worth?; Dedicated outdoor air systems; Energy models and lighting
Fire, life safety in schools; Fire protection codes; Detection, suppression, and notification; 2015 Commissioning Giants; Emergency and standby power in hospitals
HVAC and building envelope: Efficient, effective systems; Designing fire sprinkler systems; Wireless controls in buildings; 2015 Product of the Year winners
Designing positive-energy buildings; Ensuring power quality; Complying with NFPA 110; Minimizing arc flash hazards
Implementing microgrids: Controlling campus power generation; Understanding cogeneration systems; Evaluating UPS system efficiency; Driving data center PUE, efficiency
Optimizing genset sizing; How the Internet of Things affects the data center; Increasing transformer efficiency; Standby vs. emergency power in mission critical facilities
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.