ASHRAE Takes a Look at Separate IAQ Standards

Indoor-air-quality technical committee members from the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) recently conducted sessions at the ASHRAE winter meeting in Atlantic City to discuss whether separate standards need to be created for both hospitality and industrial facilities.

01/18/2002


Indoor-air-quality technical committee members from the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) recently conducted sessions at the ASHRAE winter meeting in Atlantic City to discuss whether separate standards need to be created for both hospitality and industrial facilities.

Currently, ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2001, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality , offers general guidelines for all non-residential facilities, but the question has been raised whether the nature of hospitality and industrial facilities necessitate separate standards.

For example, in an office building, indoor-air-quality standards dictate if and when an employee can smoke; however, in a hospitality establishment, it may not be in the restaurant or hotel's best interest to restrict smoking.

"A one-size-fits-all approach is not appropriate," commented ASHRAE Member Elia Sterling.

At the same time, committee chair Andy Persily, Ph.D., and committee member Steven Taylor, P.E., point out that representatives from the hospitality industry serve on the committee—and 75% of the committee's members have worked on hospitality projects—yet no clear need for a separate standard has been identified.

As for industrial facilities, some ASHRAE members noted that regulating an industrial environment to be as clean as an office is not realistic. Consequently, Standard 62.1 doesn't provide helpful guidelines.

According to Persily, the committee has recognized this need, yet the complicated nature of industrial spaces has made it difficult to establish such guidelines.

To learn more about ASHRAE Standard 62.1, visit: www.ashrae.org .





No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
BIM coordination; MEP projects; NFPA 13; Data center Q&A; Networked lighting controls; 2017 Product of the Year finalists
Emergency lighting; NFPA 3 and 4; Integrated building systems; Smart lighting, HVAC design
Designing for energy efficiency; Understanding and applying NFPA 101 for mission critical facilities; Integrating commissioning and testing for fire alarm systems; Optimizing unitary pumping solutions
Tying a microgrid to the smart grid; Paralleling generator systems; Previewing NEC 2017 changes
Driving motor efficiency; Preventing Arc Flash in mission critical facilities; Integrating alternative power and existing electrical systems
Putting COPS into context; Designing medium-voltage electrical systems; Planning and designing resilient, efficient data centers; The nine steps of designing generator fuel systems
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.
Automation Engineer; Wood Group
System Integrator; Cross Integrated Systems Group
Fire & Life Safety Engineer; Technip USA Inc.
click me