ASHRAE Research Provides Comparison Data for Unitary Equipment

11/06/2006


New research from the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers may well lead to better understanding of humidity control and energy cost when comparing unitary equipment.

ASHRAE Research Project-1254, Evaluating the Ability of Unitary Equipment to Maintain Adequate Space Humidity Levels, Phase II was funded in part by the Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Technology Institute.

“The results will help designers better understand the humidity control and energy cost impacts of the unitary equipment options compared in this project,” said lead researcher Michael J. Witte, Ph.D., GARD Analytics. “Many of these options are in limited use, so actual performance experience is not available for a broad range of building types or climates. What performs well on a restaurant in Orlando may not be effective on a retail store in Atlanta. This comparison of 18 system types across seven building types in 10 climates provides additional equipment selection information.”

The project provides designers with:

• Comprehensive analysis of humidity-control performance of a wide range of DX system configurations, including sub-cool reheat, wraparound heat pipes, dual-path systems, enthalpy heat recovery and desiccant dehumidifiers.

• Significant advancement in whole building energy simulation capabilities for modeling DX equipment by adding new capabilities to ASHRAE’s EnergyPlus software program. This provides designers and analysts with access to study specific applications and extend the results of this analysis, according to Witte.

• Identification of key issues for further exploration to better understand some of the key drivers and possibly develop some simple new system configurations that can efficiently control humidity.

The final report is available at www.ashrae.org/research .





No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
Emergency lighting; NFPA 3 and 4; Integrated building systems; Smart lighting, HVAC design
Designing for energy efficiency; Understanding and applying NFPA 101 for mission critical facilities; Integrating commissioning and testing for fire alarm systems; Optimizing unitary pumping solutions
Economics of HVAC systems; NFPA 110-2016; Designing and choosing modular data centers
Tying a microgrid to the smart grid; Paralleling generator systems; Previewing NEC 2017 changes
Driving motor efficiency; Preventing Arc Flash in mission critical facilities; Integrating alternative power and existing electrical systems
Putting COPS into context; Designing medium-voltage electrical systems; Planning and designing resilient, efficient data centers; The nine steps of designing generator fuel systems
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.
Automation Engineer; Wood Group
System Integrator; Cross Integrated Systems Group
Fire & Life Safety Engineer; Technip USA Inc.
click me