Arup Thoughts: Are more sustainability standards needed?

Sustainability became a key built environment aspiration in the mid-90s and the market quickly developed volunteer-led standards, including BREEAM and LEED.


Sustainability became a key built environment aspiration in the mid-90s and the market quickly developed volunteer-led standards, including BREEAM and LEED. Courtesy: ArupSustainability became a key built environment aspiration in the mid-90s and the market quickly developed volunteer-led standards, including BREEAM and LEED. But the industry's view of sustainability has changed since then. Environmental impact is now better understood and so ambitions have grown to encompass not just many more aspects of environmental sustainability but also harder-to-measure issues such as health and human wellbeing.

Following the success of rating systems like LEED, a plethora of new systems has now arisen — each developed to drive a specific agenda or to set higher aspirations. It's my view that we should embrace the newcomers where their particular agendas drive the best positive performance for our projects.

The existing rating systems have been enormously successful. LEED, in particular, is used all over the world and has become a marker of building quality. All the existing rating systems require a well-rounded approach to environmental sustainability including minimum standards for water use, energy use, indoor environmental quality, material use and site development.

With success comes conflict: the certification must be achievable and affordable to the majority of the market, but it must also drive innovation and exemplary performance. Rating systems manage this by awarding certifications at different levels. BREEAM ratings, for example, range from 'Pass' to 'Outstanding' while LEED runs from 'Certified' to 'Platinum'. The highest levels are intentionally hard to achieve and challenge even the best design teams to re-think their assumptions and find new solutions.

The new rating systems do this too, in different ways. The Living Building Challenge pushes for 'regenerative' outcomes, sometimes in only one area, with the ultimate goal of ensuring that the built environment has a positive net impact. The WELL building standard focuses on human health and how buildings influence this, while the International Finance Corporation's EDGE aims to raise standards quickly and affordably with a focus on developing countries. Each system drives a specific agenda or sets a much higher aspiration. I think we should welcome this where that agenda pushes us to design buildings that produce the best possible performance.

Is this fragmentation damaging or helpful? What's the best way for us to build on our platform of sustainability achievements? Do we need to have just one system? I'd like to hear your views.

Fiona Cousins is an Arup Fellow with expertise in mechanical engineering and sustainability consulting. She has a particular interest in building physics, thermal comfort and energy efficiency, and spent the first few years of my career developing software to analyze the performance of highly-glazed buildings.This article originally appeared on Arup Thoughts. Arup is a CFE Media content partner.

Edited by Ksenia Avrakhova, production coordinator, CFE Media,

No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
Emergency lighting; NFPA 3 and 4; Integrated building systems; Smart lighting, HVAC design
Designing for energy efficiency; Understanding and applying NFPA 101 for mission critical facilities; Integrating commissioning and testing for fire alarm systems; Optimizing unitary pumping solutions
Economics of HVAC systems; NFPA 110-2016; Designing and choosing modular data centers
Tying a microgrid to the smart grid; Paralleling generator systems; Previewing NEC 2017 changes
Driving motor efficiency; Preventing Arc Flash in mission critical facilities; Integrating alternative power and existing electrical systems
Putting COPS into context; Designing medium-voltage electrical systems; Planning and designing resilient, efficient data centers; The nine steps of designing generator fuel systems
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.
Automation Engineer; Wood Group
System Integrator; Cross Integrated Systems Group
Fire & Life Safety Engineer; Technip USA Inc.
click me