SEARCH Archives
Loading
Sponsored by:

Low-Cost Tweaks Yield Big-Time Savings

Once Jack Dale Associates (JDA) quantified mechanical-system interactions for Texaco's data center, specified techniques were employed to upgrade the plant while avoiding disruptions to data-processing operations. Total construction costs for chiller-plant renovations commissioned by JDA were less than $600,000.

By Consulting Specifying Engineer Staff

11/01/2000


Once Jack Dale Associates (JDA) quantified mechanical-system interactions for Texaco's data center, specified techniques were employed to upgrade the plant while avoiding disruptions to data-processing operations. Total construction costs for chiller-plant renovations commissioned by JDA were less than $600,000.

Procedures outlined by the engineering team improved energy efficiency and continue to save the petrochemical company more than $100,000 per year in utility costs. The design not only solved operating problems, but also improved the facility's ability to increase its chilled-water reserve for future expansions. Best of all, the upgrades reduced energy consumption. Key features include:

 

The upgrades help set system demand and to ensure that only the required amount of chilled water is distributed.

Before JDA began work on the project, Texaco had received a number of proposals for resolving the facility's system problems. The least onerous of the proposals would have required a two-week shutdown of the entire 5,000-ton chiller plant and over $2 million to complete.

Table 1 - Existing HVAC System Parameters


TimeBypass positionB riser flowB supply tempB return tempMain CHW supply temp FChilled water flow (gpm)Flow to labs (gpm)BAX flow (gpm)East-West riser flow (gpm)Main return header pressure (psi)Main supply header pressure (psi)IBM CDU flow (L/M)


13:00


Closed


1584


44.6


52.7


43.6


2778


414


617


1610


66


65


190


13:15


10% open


1665


44.7


52.1


43.7


2787


426


626


1661


65


64


190


13:20


15% open


1634


44.6


52.1


43.6


2737


432


637


1655


65


65


190


13:30


20% open


1666


45.0


52.0


43.7


2645


505


636


1704


65


65


200


13:38


25% open


1686


45.0


52.1


43.9


2655


504


630


1713


65


66


200


13:43


35% open


1669


44.4


52.3


44.0


2635


504


637


1728


65


66


200


13:49


Full open


1662


44.6


52.7


44.3


2671


502


630


1778


66


67


200


13:57


Full open


1363


44.1


54.5


44.3


2631


513


627


1864


68


68


145


14:08


Full open


1333


43.5


54.1


43.8


2611


517


635


930


69


70


130


Table 2 - Savings from Mechanical Plant Re-engineering


Original designRe-engineered design


HP


kW


HP


kW


Subtotal:


972


611


Subtotal:


223


118


Chiller loads:


2,200


1,760


Chiller loads:


1,600


1,280


Total HP & kW:


3,172


2,371


Total HP & kW:


1,832


1,398


Dead head factor:


0.90


Pump kW saved:


973


Total kW Demand:


2,134 kW


Total kW demand:


1,398


Use factor:


0.80


Use factor:


0.80


Annual pump utility cost:


$235,462


Annual pump utility cost:


$45,530


Added utility cost for new office space:


$79,684


Net annual utility savings after chiller plant renovations:


$110,248


Average cost per kWh: 0.055 $/kWh





No comments

Poll of the Week

When engineering systems in military buildings, what’s the most difficult issue you face?
Automation and controls
Codes and standards
Electrical and power
Energy efficiency, sustainability
Fire and life safety
HVAC


Click Here for Poll Archives
Sponsored by:

About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Subscribe to Magazine | Site Map | Privacy Policy
Home | Channels | New Products | Media Library | Connect | Industry News | Events and Awards | Newsletters | Blogs | Magazine
Control Engineering | Plant Engineering | Consulting-Specifying Engineer
All content copyright © 2010-2013 CFE Media. All rights reserved.