Pacific Scientific Shareholders to Vote on Danaher Offer

Newport Beach, Calif.— Pacific Scientific Co.'s shareholders will vote March 27 on the proposed $460 million acquisition of the company by a wholly owned subsidiary of Danaher Corp. (Washington, D.C.). Shareholders on record as of Feb. 25 will be able to vote at the special meeting, which was called by Pacific Scientific's board of directors on Feb.

03/01/1998


Newport Beach, Calif.— Pacific Scientific Co.'s shareholders will vote March 27 on the proposed $460 million acquisition of the company by a wholly owned subsidiary of Danaher Corp. (Washington, D.C.). Shareholders on record as of Feb. 25 will be able to vote at the special meeting, which was called by Pacific Scientific's board of directors on Feb. 17.

According to a merger agreement signed Jan. 31 by the two companies, Danaher's subsidiary would pay Pacific Scientific's investors about $30.25 per share. The offer also includes some Pacific Scientific debts, which would be assumed by Danaher. Besides needing a positive vote from Pacific Scientific's shareholders, Danaher's offer is also subject to federal regulatory approval.

"We're pleased with the combination of Danaher and Pacific Scientific. The businesses Danaher will be acquiring represent attractive strategic opportunities for our process/environmental controls segment," said George Sherman, Danaher's president and ceo.

Lester Hill, Pacific Scientific's chairman and ceo, added that, "I'm very excited that our board and management have fulfilled their promise to deliver full value for shareholders. The global strength of Danaher will allow customers worldwide to enjoy the performance of Pacific Scientific products, while accelerating our improvement process to enhance quality, manufacturing efficiency, and customer service."

Kollmorgen's out

This agreement killed an earlier $23.75-per-share offer from Kollmorgen Corp. (Waltham, Mass.) and cancelled that company's special shareholder meeting scheduled for Feb. 10. Kollmorgen also announced recently that it is withdrawing its recent federal litigation against Pacific Scientific, which had been filed in the U.S. District Court's Central California District.

"Our offer of $23.75 per share for Pacific Scientific was as far as we at Kollmorgen could go based solely on public information. Despite our repeated requests, Pacific Scientific declined to give us access to confidential information that might have warranted a higher offer. Accordingly, we have determined that the appropriate course of action was to terminate our offer," explains Gideon Argov, Kollmorgen's president and ceo. "The valuation accorded Pacific Scientific by Danaher clearly validates our strategy of focusing on the high performance electronic motion control market. Our objective remains to be the leading company in this field on a worldwide basis, and we will continue to build Kollmorgen toward that end, customer by customer and product by product."





No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
2014 Product of the Year finalists: Vote now; Boiler systems; Indirect cooling; Integrating lighting, HVAC
High-performance buildings; Building envelope and integration; Electrical, HVAC system integration; Smoke control systems; Using BAS for M&V
Pressure piping systems: Designing with ASME; Lab ventilation; Lighting controls; Reduce energy use with VFDs
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Consulting-Specifying Engineer case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Protecting standby generators for mission critical facilities; Selecting energy-efficient transformers; Integrating power monitoring systems; Mitigating harmonics in electrical systems
Commissioning electrical systems in mission critical facilities; Anticipating the Smart Grid; Mitigating arc flash hazards in medium-voltage switchgear; Comparing generator sizing software
Integrating BAS, electrical systems; Electrical system flexibility; Hospital electrical distribution; Electrical system grounding
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.