Is an error sufficient grounds for dismissal?

Instrument Repairman Alex Corning had an exemplary record over his 6 yr of employment. But one unfortunate day, he dropped a delicate and expensive lab instrument while it was being serviced.

01/01/1998


Instrument Repairman Alex Corning had an exemplary record over his 6 yr of employment. But one unfortunate day, he dropped a delicate and expensive lab instrument while it was being serviced. The jolt broke some components and threw a number of dials and gauges out of kilter. Damage was estimated in excess of $2000.

It couldn't have happened at a worse time. Not only was the plant on an economy drive, but Maintenance Supervisor Phil Forrester was on the carpet for being days behind schedule on important projects. Pressures and tempers were high.

When Corning anxiously reported the mishap, Forrester flew off the handle. "That does it!" he barked, and accused the repairman of gross negligence. "If you exercised normal care, it couldn't have happened."

Forrester instructed Corning to clock out and told him he'd receive his final check in the mail.

The repairman was stunned. "I have a good work record. Anyone can make an error."

"Not an error like this." Forrester refused to back down.

"I may deserve to be disciplined," Corning insisted, "but discharge is too harsh." He made a beeline for the plant steward.

Question: Do you agree that dismissal is too harsh a penalty?

Gleason's decision: "Not only does Corning have a good record," Plant Engineer Gary Gleason told Forrester, "but he was honest in taking blame for the accident, and no willful or reckless behavior was involved. Add to that the way he must feel after dropping that instrument. He's been punished enough. In my view a week's suspension will be more than adequate under the circumstances."





No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
40 Under 40; Stand-alone medical buildings; NFPA 92; Specialty fire suppression; Applying 90.1 in lighting design
2016 Product of the Year Finalists: Vote now; Data center Q&A; LED codes; Smart buildings
Fire pump power system design: How to design safe, reliable fire pump power service; Water management in commercial buildings; Emergency egress, illumination
Designing generator systems; Using online commissioning tools; Selective coordination best practices
Understanding transfer switch operation; Coordinating protective devices; Analyzing NEC 2014 changes; Cooling data centers
Designing positive-energy buildings; Ensuring power quality; Complying with NFPA 110; Minimizing arc flash hazards
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.
click me