How much employee negligence warrants discharge?

The ultimate employee discipline is termination. Under what circumstances is it justified? Dishonesty, certainly. Violence resulting in damage to person or property, assuredly. Sexual malfeasance, decidedly.

03/01/1998


The ultimate employee discipline is termination. Under what circumstances is it justified? Dishonesty, certainly. Violence resulting in damage to person or property, assuredly. Sexual malfeasance, decidedly.

What about negligence? In most cases dismissal would be too harsh a penalty. But each situation must be decided on its own merits.

Instrument Repairman Perry Shea was a marginal employee at best. Ill tempered, a heavy drinker. Macho. Maintenance department employees were encouraged to seek help in lifting an object too heavy or cumbersome for one person to handle.

Shea couldn't be bothered. He had muscle to spare. On one occasion, he picked up and dropped a heavy instrument, causing $560 damage. Maintenance Foreman Pete Schiffo instructed him in writing to ask for help in lifting or transporting heavy items in the future. A copy of the memo was placed in his personnel file. When it recurred 3-mo later, he was issued an official warning, which again became part of the record.

More recently, wrestling with a 65-lb piece of equipment, Shea, who had been drinking, tripped while trying to maneuver it through a doorway. The damage was estimated at $1300. Schiffo's response was short and simple. "That does it, Shea. You're fired."

Shea protested the action. "Dismissal is too harsh. Anyone can have an accident."

When Schiffo brushed aside his protest, Shea threatened to sue.

Question : If Shea follows through, how do you rate his chances of winning?

Krautkamer's verdict: When informed of the incident, Plant Engineer Edward Krautkamer's support of the decision was swift and decisive. "To sustain dismissal for carelessness or negligence, evidence of such negligence must be strong. Management must be ready to prove that the employee displayed an almost willful disregard of correct procedures with little, if any, regard for the consequences. It would be hard to argue that Shea doesn't fill the bill in this case."

And with that, Schiffo trotted off to deliver the message to Shea.





No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
Water use efficiency: Diminishing water quality, escalating costs; Lowering building energy use; Power for fire pumps
Building envelope and integration; Manufacturing industrial Q&A; NFPA 99; Testing fire systems
Labs and research facilities: Q&A with the experts; Water heating systems; Smart building integration; 40 Under 40 winners
Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Protecting standby generators for mission critical facilities; Selecting energy-efficient transformers; Integrating power monitoring systems; Mitigating harmonics in electrical systems
Commissioning electrical systems in mission critical facilities; Anticipating the Smart Grid; Mitigating arc flash hazards in medium-voltage switchgear; Comparing generator sizing software
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.