Fire protection pumps: Updates to NFPA 20


Pressure relief valve  

Issues with pressure relief valves continue to surface, with one committee member reporting a significant number of events where a pressure relief valve that was piped back to the fire pump suction would apparently be completely open. This results in a significant impairment to the fire protection system that may go unnoticed until the water is needed for an actual fire. This issue can occur any time the discharge from a pressure relief valve cannot be observed. When a pressure relief valve is piped back to a suction tank, a means to observe the discharge should be provided (see the sight glass in Figure 3, item 2).

Figure 3: Pressure relief valve and flow meter piped to suction. Courtesy: Aon Fire Protection Engineering

A fire pump adds energy to the water passing through it. When no water is discharging, the energy will be in the form of heat added to the water. To prevent water overheating at churn, a circulation relief valve located between the fire pump and fire pump discharge check valve is required to operate at churn pressures, but should not operate when the fire pump is flowing water (see circulation relief valve in Figure 4). When water is flowing through a pressure relief valve or a test loop piped back to suction, the pressure will be lower than churn pressure and the circulation relief valve designed to operate at churn will not operate. However, when circulating water though a closed loop, a fire pump adds even more energy to the water passing through it than under churn conditions. An additional circulation relief valve is required when a relief valve is piped back to the pump suction. This additional circulation relief valve should be set to operate below the 150% pump discharge pressure.

Figure 4: A fire pump circulation valve is shown in this photograph. Courtesy: Aon Fire Protection EngineeringWithout proper operation of the circulation relief valves, the temperature of the water will rise. In addition, if the pressure relief valve is wide open, it may cause a diesel engine (if used) to exceed its rated horsepower. When the higher temperature water is sent to the heat exchanger for cooling, the engine may overheat. In one case I am aware of, a diesel engine was destroyed and this scenario appears to be the cause.

An argument was presented that if the pressure relief valve discharged to the atmosphere, the extreme flow of water would not be ignored. Currently pressure relief valves are permitted and required only to prevent overpressurization for two reasons:

  1. Diesel overspeed conditions
  2. Failure of the variable speed mode on variable speed pumps.

Under normal operating conditions the pressure relief valve should not operate even under churn conditions. However, older fire pump installations may use the pressure relief valve to “trim” the fire pump discharge and the pressure relief valve may discharge a large volume of water well beyond churn conditions. The committee felt that the pump installations in the reported incidences did not conform to current requirements and returning pressure relief valve pipe to the pump suction was appropriate for the limited use of pressure relief valves permitted by NFPA 20.

While piping a pressure relief valve or test loop back to suction is still permitted, a requirement was added for heat exchanger cooled diesel engines to monitor the temperature of the cooling water and shut 4down the engine while operating in the test mode (only) whenever the water temperature at the engine inlet of the heat exchanger exceeds 104 F.  

As noted earlier, a separate circulation relief valve is required by NPFA 20 whenever the pressure relief valve is piped back to suction. The additional circulation relief valve is critical to prevent the fire pump from overheating. Tier 3 environmental requirements that limit the intake air temperature cannot be maintained without limiting the cooling water temperature. A circulation relief valve on a pressure relief valve piped back to suction is shown in Figure 3, item 9.

Mike , United States, 07/15/13 09:57 PM:

Unlike the pumps, drivers and controllers in other industries - fire pumps under NFPA 20 seem to have suffered more failures than all the other industries combined. Here is an example of the trail of destruction on the electric controllers alone.

The service fed electric controllers are dangerous to the point of being outside the safety limits of an NFPA 70E CAT 4. Upstream branch circuit protection is optional, setting up potential injuries like this new installation.

Many of the installations create safety hazards in the work place, crawling over pipe to get to a controller, often times located in less workspace space less than required by the NEC. In addition, the wrong conduit fittings have lead to several water damaged controllers. The remote fire alarms are seldom wired as required. Here are some examples listed in the various folders.
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
40 Under 40; Performance-based design; Clean agent fire suppression; NFPA 92; Future of commissioning; Successful project management principles
BIM coordination; MEP projects; NFPA 13; Data center Q&A; Networked lighting controls; 2017 Product of the Year finalists
Emergency lighting; NFPA 3 and 4; Integrated building systems; Smart lighting, HVAC design
Commissioning electrical systems; Designing emergency and standby generator systems; VFDs in high-performance buildings
Tying a microgrid to the smart grid; Paralleling generator systems; Previewing NEC 2017 changes
Driving motor efficiency; Preventing Arc Flash in mission critical facilities; Integrating alternative power and existing electrical systems
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.
Automation Engineer; Wood Group
System Integrator; Cross Integrated Systems Group
Fire & Life Safety Engineer; Technip USA Inc.
This course focuses on climate analysis, appropriateness of cooling system selection, and combining cooling systems.
This course will help identify and reveal electrical hazards and identify the solutions to implementing and maintaining a safe work environment.
This course explains how maintaining power and communication systems through emergency power-generation systems is critical.
click me