FCIA Promotes ‘Triad’ Solution


Chicago is the birthplace of the high-rise building and has been a world leader in building safety after the great Chicago fire in 1871. We applaud Mayor Daley, the City Council and the High Rise Building Safety Committee chaired by Alderman Bernard Stone for facilitating public discussion about fire and life safety in Chicago's buildings.

During recent testimony at the City Council, we were saddened to hear from senior citizens as well as building owners and managers that might have to move elsewhere or shutter buildings due to the expense of the high-rise building sprinkler mandate.

We, like this committee, believe Chicagoans should be protected from fire and smoke in buildings. However, we need to keep the economics of living and employing in Chicago affordable. We offer another solution. The National Association of State Fire Marshals president, Jim Burns, stated to FCIA Tuesday, February 24, 2004, "The balanced approach to fire safety through the 'Triad' of Fire Protection" is the best strategy for fire and life safety. We, too, believe implementation of the "Triad" is the solution for Chicago.

The Triad consists of effective compartmentation with firestopping; detection such as alarms; and suppression such as sprinkler systems. Compartmentation consists of fire resistance-rated (one, two or three hours) floor and wall assemblies, with smoke treatments that contain the smoke and fire to the room of origin. Firestopping seals the many holes made by wiring and other elements against fire and smoke spread, both horizontally and vertically.

FCIA has offered the Committee and City Council an alternative strategy to continue Chicago's leadership position in building safety. Effective compartmentation should be the first phase in the high-rise safety retrofit process. Fireproof compartments already exist because Chicago's older buildings were designed using brick, concrete and fire-resistant plaster and gypsum as a result of the Chicago Fire of 1871. Sealing the holes with firestopping, fire dampers and fire doors for much less than the cost of other alternatives should be the first step towards completion of the Triad.

Chicago can lead the rest of the country by protecting buildings with the least expensive option in the fire protection Triad, first by using compartmentation costing about $0.50 to $3.50 per sq. ft. The city could extended the time mandated to implement the Triad systems as can be afforded, economically and practically, allowing business and residents the ability to absorb costs associated with sprinkler systems. BOMA Chicago cites sprinkler costs at around $10 to $18 per sq. ft., not including asbestos removal at approximately $18 to $25 per sq. ft.

The benefits of compartmentation are clear: Limit fire and smoke spread to the room of origin, contain the fire and save lives economically. Since compartmentation is in Chicago's older buildings already, why not take advantage of it by firestopping and sealing the holes first?





No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
2014 Product of the Year finalists: Vote now; Boiler systems; Indirect cooling; Integrating lighting, HVAC
High-performance buildings; Building envelope and integration; Electrical, HVAC system integration; Smoke control systems; Using BAS for M&V
Pressure piping systems: Designing with ASME; Lab ventilation; Lighting controls; Reduce energy use with VFDs
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Consulting-Specifying Engineer case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Protecting standby generators for mission critical facilities; Selecting energy-efficient transformers; Integrating power monitoring systems; Mitigating harmonics in electrical systems
Commissioning electrical systems in mission critical facilities; Anticipating the Smart Grid; Mitigating arc flash hazards in medium-voltage switchgear; Comparing generator sizing software
Integrating BAS, electrical systems; Electrical system flexibility; Hospital electrical distribution; Electrical system grounding
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.