Engineering firms actively consolidating

State and federal funding levels have impacted the industry in the wake of the recession; many firms being acquired are specialty engineering firms.

09/06/2011


A recent survey of 93 consulting engineering firms across New York state conducted this summer by the American Council of Engineering Companies of New York to identify industry trends and issues indicates that firms are actively acquiring other firms, primarily non-competing specialty engineering firms. More than one-third (36%) of survey respondents report that their firm acquired another firm in the past five years. This trend is expected to continue. More than half (51%) of respondents indicated it is likely or very likely their firm will acquire another firm in the next five years.

Despite the acquisitive mood of the industry, only 17% of respondents view consolidation favorably. More than half of the participants said it forces small and mid-size firms out of the market. One-third of those surveyed say it increases cost competition, a factor that has had a significant impact on business over the past several years according to 73% of respondents. More than half (62%) anticipate that cost competition will continue to impact their business in the next year.

State and federal funding levels are also high on the list of conditions impacting the industry. Nearly two-thirds of those surveyed (62%) said New York State funding levels have had an impact and will continue to affect their business next year, while 37% said federal funding levels have affected their business, and 50.5% anticipate their impact going forward.

The use of alternative project delivery systems, such as design-build and public-private partnerships, is also expected to trend upward over the next five years. Currently, 75% of respondents report that their firms have been involved in design-build projects and 27% have been involved in public-private partnerships. Almost half (48%) of respondents have a positive view of both methods. An additional 29% were neutral on design-build and 39% were neutral on public-private partnerships. Most of those surveyed (75%) foresee the use of alternative delivery methods increasing over the next five years.

In rating industry conditions overall, more engineers describe their business as fair (50.5%), and the same as last year (44%), than any other category of response. Only 7.5% rated their business “not good.” Most of the engineers (61%) who participated in the 2011 survey were at least somewhat optimistic about the outlook for 2012. This is an increase from a similar study conducted in 2009, which indicated a positive outlook among 46% of those surveyed.

- Edited by Chris Vavra, Consulting-Specifying Engineer, www.csemag.com 



No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
High-performance buildings; Building envelope and integration; Electrical, HVAC system integration; Smoke control systems; Using BAS for M&V
Pressure piping systems: Designing with ASME; Lab ventilation; Lighting controls; Reduce energy use with VFDs
Smoke control: Designing for proper ventilation; Smart Grid Standard 201P; Commissioning HVAC systems; Boilers and boiler systems
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Consulting-Specifying Engineer case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Protecting standby generators for mission critical facilities; Selecting energy-efficient transformers; Integrating power monitoring systems; Mitigating harmonics in electrical systems
Commissioning electrical systems in mission critical facilities; Anticipating the Smart Grid; Mitigating arc flash hazards in medium-voltage switchgear; Comparing generator sizing software
Integrating BAS, electrical systems; Electrical system flexibility; Hospital electrical distribution; Electrical system grounding
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.