Designing laboratory ventilation systems
Clinical (biological) labs are generally located in hospitals but are sometimes separate, independent, and located away from the patient care and treatment areas. The lab may be classified as a business (B) occupancy, but if located within the hospital, it is subject to hospital licensing requirements, which include proper air change rates, pressure relationships, and temperature and relative humidity requirements.
Functions associated with clinical labs include bacteriology, biochemistry, cytology, glass washing, histology, microbiology, pathology, and serology, as well as general lab functions. Many of these functions occur in smaller separate rooms due to odors, space temperature, and local capture requirements—as well as worker safety.
Supply airflow arrangement, airflow velocity, and point of capture are all extremely important to the overall function and successful containment of contaminants, odors, and gas vapors. Supply air devices of Group A (outlets mounted in or near the ceiling that discharge air horizontally) or E (outlets mounted in or near the ceiling that project primary air vertically) should be located in the ceiling where practical and deliver air so the velocity near a fume hood is approximately 50% of the hood face velocity or in most cases about 50 fpm. Hoods should be located out of the general walkway to minimize air currents and disruption of airflow. The HVAC design engineer must be involved in the lab planning to provide input to make the airflow and ventilation system functional without sacrificing safety. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) may be a consideration in special cases or for complex HVAC/lab designs.
According to ASHRAE 62.1-2010, air (return, transfer, exhaust) shall be classified and its recirculation limited in accordance with its classification. There are four classes of air according to the standard.
- Class 1: Air with low contaminant concentration, low sensory-irritation intensity, and inoffensive odor. Class 1 air may be recirculated or transferred to any space.
- Class 2: Air with moderate contaminant concentration, mild sensory-irritation intensity, or mildly offensive odors. Class 2 air may be recirculated within the space of origin, but not to a Class 1 space.
- Class 3: Air with significant contaminant concentration, significant sensory-irritation intensity, or offensive odor. Class 3 air may be recirculated within the space of origin, but not to any other space.
- Class 4: Air with highly objectionable fumes or gases or with potentially dangerous particles, bioaerosols, or gases at concentrations high enough to be considered harmful. Class 4 air shall not be recirculated or transferred to any space nor recirculated within the space of origin.
Fume hood exhaust air is defined by Standard 62.1 in Table 5-2 as a Class 4. NFPA 45, paragraphs 8.3 and 8.4, also coincide with this requirement. Outdoor air established as a minimum ventilation rate in the Standard lists 10 cfm/person and 0.18 cfm/sq ft as a minimum for the breathing zone, which is defined as a space 3 to 72 in. above the floor.
Class 4 fume hood air discharge separation from air intakes or operable windows should be no closer than 30 ft but also meet the requirements of NFPA 45 and ANSI/AIHA Z9.5. Exhaust rates noted in ASHRAE 62.1 Table 6-4 for science labs note a minimum exhaust rate of 1.00 cfm/sq ft. With enough fume hoods this can usually be met, but localized exhaust for odor control and/or to meet minimum ventilation rates, air change, or non-recirculation requirements may also be needed.
One thing to note is that ventilation air is defined in ASHRAE 62.1-2010 as that portion of supply air that is outdoor air plus any recirculated air that has been treated for the purpose of maintaining indoor air quality (IAQ). While the majority of ventilation air used for proper IAQ and makeup air is outdoor air, it may be possible to filter and treat Class 2 and 3 exhaust air for use as makeup air or route the exhaust air through an energy recovery device with limited leakage, possibly saving energy.
Fume hood exhaust fans should be the type that discharge air vertically with sufficient velocity (3000 fpm minimum) and with adequate stack height (7 ft minimum above roof level, 10 ft recommended) to allow fan observation and maintenance without being exposed to the discharge airstream. The stack height provides better opportunity for dilution as well. To achieve sufficient air velocity, an exit cone that reduces the outlet stack diameter and thus increases the air velocity may be necessary. Keep in mind this sudden diameter change can add a significant pressure drop by an average of 0.5 in. w.g. Redundant fans for critical applications are often employed to provide constant airflow in hoods and similar applications. Controls for fan operation usually consist of current sensing relays on fan motors, airflow switches, or differential pressure switches that prove fan operation and airflow. Control sequences of operation would identify lead/lag fan operation, alarm status, and proven airflow indication in a BAS and/or locally at the fume hood.
Exhaust systems from chemical fume hoods may be ducted individually from each hood to its own fan or be manifolded from several hoods to one fan. This latter arrangement requires careful air balancing and possibly redundant discharge fans to avoid an entire lab being shut down upon a loss of airflow. Additionally, compatibility of chemicals and contaminants must be carefully evaluated before exhaust streams are combined to avoid potential hazards or corrosion. Manifolded systems can be either constant volume or variable volume. Pressure dependent systems are constant volume only and usually employ manual volume dampers for balancing. Any changes to a system such as adding or removing a fume hood would require re-balancing of the entire system. Pressure independent systems are either constant or variable volume and employ pressure independent air volume regulators or air valves with each fume hood or exhaust device. Control of the airflow device can be from sash position sensors or air velocity sensors at the fume hood (face velocity determination). There are other methods as well, but the goal is to provide constant minimum required hood face velocity for proper fume and vapor capture.
Large chemical labs such as teaching and science laboratories with many fume hoods may be able to take advantage of differing usage factors that can reduce the amount of exhaust and makeup air required, thus saving energy and increasing equipment life. The usage factor must be used prudently and generally takes the following into consideration: total number of fume hoods, available airflow diversity, type of fume hood controls, laboratory makeup air and ventilation system type, number of devices (hoods) that must operate continuously, and hours per session/day hoods are actually in use.
Some chemicals such as formalin, formaldehyde, and glutaraldehyde are used as tissue preservatives and sterilants in clinical labs and similar health care settings. Many times these chemicals are used in operations performed in the open at counter level with the transfer of the liquid from one container to another by pouring or by gravity through a hose. This action allows fumes to become airborne and must be captured near the point of use by proper airflow direction. Airflow across the back of the worker with the point of capture and pickup at the counter level is a good method. Air velocity at the work surface needs to be slow enough to not evaporate the chemical, but yet adequate enough at the inlet (100 fpm minimum) to collect the vapors and prevent them from permeating the adjacent work stations. Best practice guides and standards for the safe use of these chemicals prepared by OSHA and Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) recommend air change rates and point of vapor release airflow guidelines.
Air balance and pressurization of lab spaces can be tricky with controls and air system responses continually fluctuating due to opening of doors to adjacent spaces or airflow volumes changing to accommodate space temperature requirements. Accurate air measurements of supply air devices and exhaust systems are needed to balance the system. Strategic placement of pressure sensors will help determine if the required pressure relationship is being maintained. ANSI Z9.5 recommends that an air volume rate offset be used rather than controlling to a specific differential pressure. However, this offset will typically result in a 0.01 to 0.02 in. w.g. differential. Figure 5 shows a general lab with pressure sensor locations.
Duct construction should be specified and provided to achieve less than 1% leakage of design airflow; however, the design goal for both supply air (positive) and exhaust air (negative) duct systems should be for zero leakage. Exhaust duct construction and materials should be appropriate for the chemicals and fumes that are to be captured. The HVAC designers should consult with lab users and safety personnel to obtain a list of the types and quantities of chemicals proposed to be used both in and outside of fume hoods, along with storage quantities anticipated. The chemical type will help the designer choose the correct duct material and jointing method to effect safe movement of the vapors and contaminants.
Space temperature (70 to 75 F) and relative humidity requirements are dependent on the lab function and heat gain to the space. Lab personnel wearing protective clothing may require temperatures in the lower portion of the range in order to remain comfortable. While a specific relative humidity is not identified in the various codes, it is usually maintained in the 30% to 60% range. With the constant volume air supply in most labs, temperature control of occupied work areas is usually achieved through single duct reheat systems or double duct air terminal units.
The MERV ratings are a measurement scale established by ASHRAE 52.2-2007 that identifies the efficiency and capture capability of particle sizes from 10 microns to less than 0.3 microns. The MERV ratings range from 1 through 20 with the higher the value, the greater the capture and efficiency. A MERV 8 filter will trap greater than 90% of particles sizes 3.0 to 10 microns. A MERV 13 filter has a dust spot efficiency of 89% to 90% and will capture droplet nuclei of 1.0 to 3.0 microns such as that from a sneeze. Higher MERV ratings of 16 will capture bacteria and particles as small as 0.30 microns. Usually, a MERV 14 (90% to 95% efficiency) is used in an air system supplying air to a lab.
Air supplied to labs requires filtration of a MERV 13 minimum in central air systems requiring either 1 or 2 filter beds in order to provide relatively clean air for the lab environment. Some functions, such as pharmacological preparation, infectious, or radioactive material use, require HEPA filters on both the supply and exhaust airstreams. Sometimes the HEPA filters are installed at the point of air delivery into the room, but more often the work is isolated to a Class I or Class II bio-safety cabinet with the HEPA filters installed in the cabinet. Filters in the exhaust stream of these cabinets must be designed to allow the safe removal, disposal, and replacement of these filters, such as with a bag-in/bag-out type of filter holding assembly. Work in a bio-safety cabinet requires a clean work surface but also allows for the dispersion of bacteria and related particles. Proper capture of these particles through filtration is essential for safe operation. A bag-in/bag-out housing incorporates a bag that completely covers the filter prior to its removal so all particles are kept on the filter and not accidentally released into the occupied environment or onto personnel changing the filter.
Animal facility considerations
Laboratory animals require comfortable, clean, and temperature-controlled conditions that afford proper safety and welfare of each animal species. The HVAC design for such spaces must consider the temperature and relative humidity ranges associated with not only the animals, but the research protocol for the particular study. Air distribution and air movement are dependent on the housing of the animals. Open cages, shoebox cages, species type, number and size of animals, length of stay in primary or secondary enclosures, and heat generation of the animals are considerations that must be part of the HVAC design parameters. The ASHRAE Handbook—HVAC Applications has lab descriptions and is a good guide, along with references for design considerations of animal facilities.
Regulations, standards, and good practice design requirements from various organizations must be reviewed and followed as they would apply to the particular application. These include:
- American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC)
- Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
- Institute for Laboratory Animal Resources (ILAR)
- The Animal Welfare Act with authority vested in the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture (USDA)
- Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, National Research Council
- Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 21, Part 58: Good Laboratory Practices for Non-Clinical Laboratory Studies.
Temperature and relative humidity in animal spaces must be flexible and closely controlled to match the research protocol. Temperature ranges between 64 to 85F are common with a +/-2F accuracy. Relative humidity ranges of 30% to 60% are considered acceptable.
An air change rate is a calculation of space volume and airflow which results in the number of minutes it takes for the air to “change.” An example: a 20x 20-ft room with a 9-ft ceiling height has a volume of 3600 cubic feet (cf). If the space is supplied with 900 cfm of air, the air would be “changed” every 4 minutes (3600 cf / 900 cfm = 4 minutes), which then results in 15 ACH (60 min/hour/4 min). Placement of supply air and air removal devices will determine if all of the air is actually changed. This is part of the overall design challenge.
Air change rates of 10 to 15 ACH have been accepted guidelines to keep odors under control and provide adequate ventilation for high respiration rate animals. While the ACH may be suitable, other factors such as animal heat gain, lights and equipment heat gain, other exhaust requirements (fume hoods), and quantity of animals must be considered to determine correct airflow.
Air distribution device type and delivered air velocity, along with high or low return/exhaust placement, may affect actual ventilation rates or create drafts. Fluctuating animal population may allow for reduced airflow rates while maintaining desired space conditions.
Other spaces and functions generally associated with animal facilities—cage washing, surgery rooms, food storage, treatment rooms, refrigerated storage rooms, and necropsy labs—require careful design, air quantity, filtration, temperature, and relative humidity control. Isolation or quarantine spaces are also found in these facilities and are treated similar to other airborne infectious isolation rooms.
HVAC design for laboratories requires team discussions and planning, identification of design parameters, and adherence to applicable design codes and standards, along with a willingness to agree on the ultimate goals—worker safety, fume and vapor containment and capture, product preservation, and adherence to research protocol. HVAC systems for labs cannot be designed in a vacuum. The more you learn along the way, the better the system design and layout will become and the better functionality the lab will have.
J. Patrick Banse has more than 35 years of experience in the consulting engineering field with the past 30 years in health care design and engineering. He is a member of Consulting-Specifying Engineer's editorial advisory board. Chris St. Cyr is a senior mechanical designer. He has more than 24 years of mechanical design experience, with the past 15 years in the design of health care facilities and clinical labs.
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Consulting-Specifying Engineer case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.