Communication Networks, Buses Tie Controls to Real World

11/01/1997


As controls and automation become more distributed and integrated, industrial communication networks and buses are becoming more crucial because they link controls with real world, in-the-trench, manufacturing processes. However, due to growing choices of networks, protocols, buses, and node connections, it is helpful to understand the basic aspects of each network or bus before picking an overall architecture.

Physical topologies include linear buses (with drops), and daisy-chained, ring (where all nodes are connected in a physical ring), star, and mixed types. Each has its own advantages and drawbacks.

Bus arbitration schemes include master-slave and peer-to-peer (CSMA or collision sense/multi-access, and token-passing). On a master-slave network, a master node manages network access, typically polling each node and granting access. Peer-to-peer networks share bus ownership with all nodes having equal access. Token-passing buses (token ring/token bus) give token holders bus ownership until the token is passed.

CSMA allows any network node to exchange data if the bus is idle. Each node monitors transmission, and temporarily backs off if it finds a collision. This makes bus use of bandwidth efficient, but can sometimes degrade throughput in heavily loaded networks.

Many buses are able to broadcast status data periodically, and then any node can retreive what it needs and use it immediately. This is known as producer/consumer technology. ControlNet, DeviceNet, Fieldbus Foundation, and WorldFIP protocols are based on producer/consumer industry technology, which permits all nodes on the network to have this simultaneous access to the same data from a single source.

Industrial communication networks can be grouped into three basic categories: general-purpose networks, fieldbuses, and device buses (also referred to as bit-level buses). Various physical topologies and arbitration schemes exist for each type.

General-purpose communication networks provide broadcast and point-to-point messaging between nodes, and perhaps to other networks via bridges. Networks such as Ethernet, ARCNet, FDDI, IBM Token Ring, and MAP, are used for data gathering, interprocess exchange of control data and sequencing information, and remote access.

Fieldbuses are optimized to exchange periodic data--also known as producer/consumer information--with I/O devices, while providing time-slices for point-to-point messaging and network management tasks. Both messaging and network management capabilities assist in remote coordination of I/O devices (such as configuration and diagnostics) among other possibilities. Many provide bus electrical isolation among nodes, and add device profiles which virtualize equipment from different manufacturers, thus providing a common access model in applications. Fieldbus Foundation, Profibus, and SP50 are typical examples.

Device buses, such as AS-I (AS Interface) and Seriplex, provide cost-effective connectivity to I/O devices. Although the cabling and data rates are not typically advanced, actual throughput can be quite high due to the reduced frame size and simplified bus arbitration and addressing schemes.

Other networks and buses tend to fall between these categories. Newer, so-called sensor buses, such as DeviceNet, CAN, and SDS offer some benefits of a fieldbus, while keeping connectivity costs closer to device buses. Some offer remote configuration of I/O devices and programmability.





No comments
Consulting-Specifying Engineer's Product of the Year (POY) contest is the premier award for new products in the HVAC, fire, electrical, and...
Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine is dedicated to encouraging and recognizing the most talented young individuals...
The MEP Giants program lists the top mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection engineering firms in the United States.
2014 Product of the Year finalists: Vote now; Boiler systems; Indirect cooling; Integrating lighting, HVAC
High-performance buildings; Building envelope and integration; Electrical, HVAC system integration; Smoke control systems; Using BAS for M&V
Pressure piping systems: Designing with ASME; Lab ventilation; Lighting controls; Reduce energy use with VFDs
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Consulting-Specifying Engineer case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Protecting standby generators for mission critical facilities; Selecting energy-efficient transformers; Integrating power monitoring systems; Mitigating harmonics in electrical systems
Commissioning electrical systems in mission critical facilities; Anticipating the Smart Grid; Mitigating arc flash hazards in medium-voltage switchgear; Comparing generator sizing software
Integrating BAS, electrical systems; Electrical system flexibility; Hospital electrical distribution; Electrical system grounding
As brand protection manager for Eaton’s Electrical Sector, Tom Grace oversees counterfeit awareness...
Amara Rozgus is chief editor and content manager of Consulting-Specifier Engineer magazine.
IEEE power industry experts bring their combined experience in the electrical power industry...
Michael Heinsdorf, P.E., LEED AP, CDT is an Engineering Specification Writer at ARCOM MasterSpec.