Advertisement
FREE subscription
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Variable Speed at Alliant Energy

-- Consulting-Specifying Engineer, 10/1/2000

Using the basic design concepts employed at Harley-Davidson University (see page 28), an enhanced version was developed for the Alliant Energy World Headquarters located in Madison, Wisconsin. This 320,000-square-foot building currently under construction is a working model for the efficient energy-management policy of this utility company.

The building utilizes state-of-the-art lighting systems, high-performance glass and enhanced thermal characteristics, which are the first major step in maximizing overall building performance. Both chilled- and hot-water systems utilize primary/secondary variable-speed pumping.

The chiller plant consists of water-side economizer cooling in conjunction with a 3,240-ton-hour ice-storage chiller system. The overall building design cooling load is 640 tons, which is met by first reducing the chilled-water temperature with the chillers and then further lowering the temperature via the ice system.

Because the chillers are used to build ice, constant-flow pumps are used for the primary side. Variable-speed pumps are used in conjunction with plate-and-frame heat exchangers for the secondary side of the system. In addition to this, variable-speed pumps are used for the condenser water.

Condenser-water flow is maintained by sensing the differential pressure across the condenser and automatic valve. The two-way automatic control valve is modulated in response to changes in chiller-refrigerant head pressure.

Control limits are set to maintain the minimum flow at or above three feet per second to prevent fouling. The design intent is to provide the coldest water possible to the condenser, and this is accomplished via an outdoor wet-bulb sensor that resets the temperature controller for the variable-speed tower fans. In addition, the chiller compressor speed is controlled by variable-frequency drives. Anticipated chiller full- and part-load performance as determined by computer simulation are shown in the above Table.

Simulated CHILLER PERFORMANCE

Percent Load

Tons Refrigeration per Chiller

kW per Ton

100

200

.590

75

150

.460

50

100

.390

25

50

.540

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

There are no other articles written by this author.



SPONSORED LINKS

 
Advertisement
Sponsored Links

More Content

  • Blogs

Blogs


Sorry, no blogs are active for this topic.

» VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Advertisements





NEWSLETTERS
Plug in and get the latest CSE news, trends and industry updates delivered directly to your inbox!

Green Scene
CSE Codes & Standards
CSE NewsWatch
CSE Fire and Life Safety Solutions
CSE Business of Engineering Management Report
CSE Electrical Solutions
CSE HVAC Solutions
Pure Power
CSE Product Showcase
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites