Log In   |  Register Free Newsletter Subscription
Skip navigation
Zibb
Subscribe to Consulting-Specifying Engineer
Email
Print
Reprints/License
RSS

Cycling through fan options

Engineers must match the best fan to its use and performance.

By J. Patrick Banse, PE, LEED AP Senior Mechanical Engineer, Smith Seckman Reid Inc., Houston -- Consulting-Specifying Engineer, 3/1/2008 1:00:00 AM

Web Extra: Listen to a podcast with the author on this subject. Click here.


Owning and operating costs, noise, environment, availability, service duty, and power are but a few of the factors engineers need to consider when selecting a fan for a long and efficient life.

Matching the best fan selection to use and performance is the primary goal. With new construction, the designer has time to design the air-moving system and select the best fan type for the use. When a fan needs replacing, the schedule may not always allow a new “design” to take place without extensive system downtime.

Table 1 in Chapter 18 of the “2004 ASHRAE Systems and Equipment Handbook” shows different types of fans and fan design characteristics along with performance and usual applications. Fan manufacturers also have selection guidelines to aid in proper fan selection.

Fan service life ranges from 15 years for propeller fans to 25 years for centrifugal fans, according to studies published in Table 4 of Chapter 36 in the “2007 ASHRAE Applications Handbook.” Obviously, factors such as installation, environment, maintenance, and operating conditions affect the service life. In addition to these factors, what other considerations are there in the fan lifecycle selection? Figure 1 shows some items to consider.

Initial costs (owning) and power and maintenance cost (operating) are generally the primary selectors when choosing a fan. For a fan to last 20 years, proper maintenance must be provided, which includes designing adequate installation and maintenance space at new construction. The installation should allow fans to be inspected, disassembled, and greased.

Fans installed with proper duct inlet and outlet connections will lead to higher operating efficiency, less power use, and quieter operation. Fan bearing noise, vibration, and belt condition/slippage are items that should be inspected for regularly in an effective maintenance program.

Where floor space is not available, an inline type fan might be needed. Inline centrifugal fans generally are noisier and require sound attenuators that add to the initial cost life. Maintenance on a suspended fan also may be more difficult due to less-than-desirable access.

The need for flexibility in design, future air volume, and the fan's ability to operate at less than peak air volume (i.e., part-load efficiency) are additional parameters of fan lifecycle selection. The fan laws are mathematical formulas that predict fan performance and power requirements for a series of aerodynamically similar fans based on varying the fan size, fan speed, or air density given the volume or pressure are fixed. The fan laws and explanations for use are available in ASHRAE handbooks and in most manufacturers' fan catalogs. The fan laws also will help identify new performance characteristics of an existing fan to help determine if a more efficient fan of differing size and speed with a better lifecycle cost can be used.

Bigger may be better

Consider a fan operating continuously at 8,760 hours/yr at an energy cost of $0.15/kWh. Airflow is 5,000 cfm at a pressure of 1 in. of water. A manufacturer's catalog for centrifugal utility fan may show a reasonable selection for a 24-in. diameter fan requiring 0.9 bhp at 690 rpm, while a 20-in. diameter fan costing $300 less requires 1.25 bhp at 1,005 rpm.

It would appear that both fans require a 1.5 hp motor, but the larger diameter fan operating at a slower speed will require less power and potentially last longer with fewer bearing problems and operate more quietly, thus making the lifecycle cost more beneficial for the larger diameter fan. Installation and maintenance costs are assumed the same for both fans. The power required includes fan drive losses of 3% to 5%.

The energy cost is calculated by the following method:

number of hours/yr x power (bhp) x 0.746 kW/bhp x dollars/kWh

Using the formula, the energy costs are:

Fan size Energy cost

24 in. $882

20 in. $1,225

Annual savings: $343 (less than 1 year payback).

It is important to consider both the fan and system design when defining the fan lifecycle cost. The operational characteristics may be the driving factor in a long-term scenario, but if the fan cannot be (or is not) properly maintained, the energy performance may not be a factor as the fan may require early replacement. In this case, the fan lifecycle cost is limited to initial cost (owning) and energy cost (operating) for a shorter time period.

Author Information
Banse has spent the past 25 years in healthcare facility design and engineering. He is a member of CSE's editorial advisory board.
Email
Print
Reprints/License
RSS
Talkback
Related Content
Reed Business Information Resource Center

Featured Company


Most Recent Resources

Advertisement
Sponsored Links
More Content
  • Blogs

Sorry, no blogs are active for this topic.

VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Advertisement
Uptime125x125-B
NEWSLETTERS
NewsWatch
Business of Engineering Management Report
Fire, Security, Life-Safety Newsletter
Electrical Newsletter
HVAC Newsletter
Pure Power Newsletter
Product Showcase Newsletter
Greenscene
CSE Codes & Standards



Please read our Privacy Policy

About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Free Subscription   |   Affiliate Links   |   RSS
© 2010 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy